You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
The poor girl doesn't seem to move for the first 3 minutes, and the background noise is plain awful...
Offline
Reading your post was the total waste of time.
Offline
Guess I'll cancel my membership if moderators insult paying members who express their opinions....Geesh!
Offline
I like very much these silent, quiet build ups sliding to a sudden orgasm. It's same as a concentrated meditation.
For instance:
0573, 0384, 0240, 0373
Long live the hedonism, –enjoy your sexual pleasure!
Offline
Guess I'll cancel my membership if moderators insult paying members who express their opinions....Geesh!
Well that is your perrogative. But if I were a contributor to this site and I read a comment like that I would wonder why I had bothered. If you think it's OK for people to insult the contributors but not OK for the moderators to pull you up on it, you have a very distorted perspective.
Offline
When anybody puts anything on display, folks will express their opinions.
As a moderator you need to understand that members PAY to be here, and nowhere in your membership terms does it state that we have to like everything or that we can't express our opinion.
Moderators have no business insulting paying members.
What would you do if you went to the manager of a shop and explained that the milk you just bought was spoiled and he told you to quit wasting his time!?
No distorted perpective on my part...just a moderator who doesn't think before he replies.
Offline
These are people, not bottles of milk. Our Terms of Sale, specifically para 15, show that you are utterly ill-informed.
When anybody puts anything on display, folks will express their opinions.
As a moderator you need to understand that members PAY to be here, and nowhere in your membership terms does it state that we have to like everything or that we can't express our opinion.
Moderators have no business insulting paying members.
What would you do if you went to the manager of a shop and explained that the milk you just bought was spoiled and he told you to quit wasting his time!?
No distorted perpective on my part...just a moderator who doesn't think before he replies.
Offline
Richard, if I may: Filmclip's ... interesting perspective on human beings as equivalent to milk bottles really tells us all we need to know. I doubt that there's any reasoning with this individual, so why go through the annoyance of trying?
Humbly,
Vaudeville/Burlesque.
Maintain a sense of humour about it, whatever "it" is.
Offline
You MUST like every single one of our videos, if you DON'T you can't let anyone know!
Paying members MUST keep all critical remarks to themselves!
And you think I have problems....
Offline
Filmclip, Burlesque is probably right about the futility of replying to you, but I'll try, just once, to calmly explain something to you about the ethos of this site:
The videos you see are honest depictions of real intimate moments on the part of the contributors. A few of these folks have also contributed to other similar sites (ISM, IFM, AW), but for many, if not most, of them, it's a first... a one-time decision to, for whatever personal reason, share one of their most private moments with us. When you comment, you're not commenting on a piece of video; you're commenting on a real person's real orgasm. People come however they come, and regardless of whether or not a particular person's particular way of coming turns you on, surely you can see that it's a bit brutal to say, as your initial post seemed to, that somebody's orgasm is a waste of time.
If you have a technical criticism about how a clip is edited or presented, that's on the order of customer feedback, and I'd say you should address that privately with Richard or Lauren. If, OTOH, it's just that a given vid doesn't float your boat... well, I'm sure each of us has a list of agonies in that category, given that tastes vary, but that says more about us as viewers than it does about the worth of the agonees' orgasms. You might just barely be able to say something on the order of "this isn't my particular cup of tea" without giving offense, if you worded it carefully... but really, why? Why not focus on the ones that do rock your world? Surely there's no shortage of those?
Offline
Well personally I liked it I think she is hot and would love to see her for real. Look at the neck you can see the heart rate pick up and the blood pressure rise. You could see the orgasm build the confession was good to listen to first thankyou Ms 573.
Offline
Without wishing to disparage other denizens of the Land of the Free, I can't help wondering if filmclip is another of those Americans who appear to believe that their precious First Amendment gives them a universal right to be as obnoxious as they please wherever and whenever the fancy takes them, regardless of the sensibilities of others...
takochan
Offline
could be. Meanwhile, this denizen of the Land of the (Faux-)Free would like to invite everyone over to the thread below, which is where we can really sing the praises that ought to be sung of this lovely woman. I was enthralled. Ms 573: if ever I come to your neck of the woods, I hope you'll do me the honour of allowing me to take you to dinner, if only to hear you speak further about, well, anything, really. Perfect voice, perfectly elegant expression of movement.
Just realized that part of why I'm so taken with Ms 573 is that my family hails from a former British colonialist holding; my father and aunt and cousins all speak with this lovely british accent softened by 30-odd years in the States, which is sor ot but not quite like someone who is from the States or Canada and then has lived in a someplace like England or Australia or New Zealand or Zimbabwe, etc for some years.
Meanwhile, I just sound like your typical American newscaster.
Offline
Tannsolo, if you sound like an American newscaster I would be very surprised indeed. You see, you have a personality, something which said newscasters notoriously lack (or hide extremely well).
Vaudeville/Burlesque/Risqué entertainment of any kind favoured.
Maintain a sense of humour about it, whatever "it" is.
Offline
you have a personality, something which said newscasters notoriously lack (or hide extremely well).
Nahh, you're just thinking of the guys. This thread has now got me fantasizing about Katie Couric's (sadly imaginary) BA and/or IFM submissions. Campbell Brown next?
Offline
filmclip, richard is right. if you can't see the point...
Offline
Have you guys ever thought of different types of trollism?
I mean, there's the one who prefers hostility despite the danger of being banned. We have all experienced that.
And there could be another kind that tries to make it hard for the moderator's conscience to ban him, by appearing as innocent as possible, while making totally unnecessary posts lacking any real point/opinion of his own.
Offline
Good point, Al: a different and more insidious beastie altogether.
However, I think it's time to stop posting in this thread, so that it may sink into the oblivion it deserves.
Vaudeville.
Maintain a sense of humour about it, whatever "it" is.
Offline
Pages: 1