After #3 I only have one Question - Ruby will you marry me??

northdallas1968 · 2006-02-17 17:35:01

ruby wrote:

i agree, the ability to listen, understand and reply with lack of vindictive emotion is very, very attractive.
if the oppostive of offence is challenge that is exactly what i feel. I welcome and court opinions that differ from mine...so please don't hold back
Garybob....not sure if you forgot but this thread was started by a loyal fan who wanted to offer his hand in marriage! Maybe he has changed his mind about me know he knows my values, wink
Don't worry i have no shortage of offers........
So lets return to the theme of this thread, anyone else out their crazy enough to want to be tied down to this wanton woman? (comment made with tounge firmly planted in my cheek)

My offer is still on the table!! I still think you would be a wonderful partner!

erdna · 2006-02-18 20:40:28

northdallas1968, you have been patient and solid in your request and still are. Talking about a man of conviction! Generally, a woman takes that in consideration. Don't give up.

PC elmo · 2006-02-21 18:54:31

Jo wrote:

The word "freedom" can be used in two different ways.
Freedom in the sense of beeing no longer dependent on something (someONE?) which I would like to define as a physical way of freedom
and
Freedom in the sense of doing what someone wants to do (being independant). This is more a psychical manner of freedom.
Don't misunderstand me, I think the freedom of thoughts is a highly valuable estate! But unfortunately, as we all know, the word freedom has too often be misused to justify selfish purposes and to push through the own way of thinking.
And that's what is dangerous...

Yes, I agree (I think). And it seems to me that submitting an agony to this site is primarily an outward physical action -- a "physical" freedom? -- while enjoying the finished product (though it may involve very physical activities for some of us) is primarily a freedom of thought. Or am I completely misunderstanding?

ruby · 2006-02-22 03:10:02

thanks northdallas :0

erdna · 2006-03-02 04:52:28

Ruby, in the other thread Ruby, Ruby... I mentioned I saw your pictures on AW. SUPER HOT Do you have the intention to do some videos with Abby?

Garybobs · 2006-03-05 19:16:58

Actually saw a clip of Ruby for AW where she is dancing totally nude, and masturbating totally nude. That was light-years above and beyond anything she did here on BA. She's actually much thinner than she appears with clothes on and every bit as attractive.

Last edited by Garybobs (2006-03-05 19:17:59)

Bishop Of Bath & Wells · 2006-03-05 19:22:29

Garybobs wrote:

Actually saw a clip of Ruby for AW where she is dancing totally nude, and masturbating totally nude. That was light-years above and beyond anything she did here on BA. She's actually much thinner than she appears with clothes on and every bit as attractive.

I have to say, Ruby is also a far prettier name than Nona..........

Bish

erdna · 2006-03-06 05:40:42

Nona or our Ruby will be again at AW at the beginning of this week.

dauphinb · 2006-03-06 05:56:22

Garybobs wrote:

Actually saw a clip of Ruby for AW where she is dancing totally nude, and masturbating totally nude.

Did you find actual video of Ruby/Nona there? All I saw were still pix, a total of 3 image sets across two separate shoots. Per erdna, there seems to be more coming (no pun intended) from her; perhaps you stumbled across a sneak preview?

Garybobs · 2006-03-06 18:57:38

It was an Abby Winters "Newsletter" clip of upcoming models for the week that I stumbled across on GUBA. I don't subscribe to AW. More stills I think than clips, or is that ISM?

Anyway, I don't even know whom this Nona person is but Ruby was sizzling. And yes, it is a video clip, not still pics. Can send it to you if you'd like.

Last edited by Garybobs (2006-03-06 18:59:21)

dauphinb · 2006-03-07 06:06:04

Garybobs wrote:

It was an Abby Winters "Newsletter" clip of upcoming models for the week...

Ahh, that explains it. I don't generally watch the video newsletters because they play in Windows Media Player rather than QT, and it's inconvenient to erase the history in the former.

Garybobs wrote:

I don't subscribe to AW. More stills I think than clips, or is that ISM?

AW is more stills than videos numerically, but still plenty of vids... and plenty featuring the "moment of truth" near and dear to all BA members. I generally ignore the still imagesets and only download the Intimate Moments (aka masturbation to completion) and "Tier 3 girl-girl" (aka full-on g-g sex) clips... yet even so, I have trouble finding the time to watch everything I download. Of course, that may be *partly* because I always give new BA content first priority!

I don't subscribe to ISM; saving budget for the mystical "new site."

Garybobs wrote:

Anyway, I don't even know whom this Nona person is but Ruby was sizzling. And yes, it is a video clip, not still pics. Can send it to you if you'd like.

"Nona" is the AW handle of the lovely we know as "Ruby." Long odds neither is her real-world name... but "a rose is a rose is a rose," eh? 8)

uri · 2006-03-10 13:35:57

AND NOW ATTENTION PLEASE!

The most stupid Sixty-Four Thousend Dollar Question. Who knows it?

Why Ruby is called Ruby? :rolleyes

Jo · 2006-03-10 13:53:01

uri wrote:

AND NOW ATTENTION PLEASE!
The most stupid Sixty-Four Thousend Dollar Question. Who knows it?
Why Ruby is called Ruby?

Do you have to know the german language to understand the analogy I am thinking you refer to...?

ashmedi · 2006-03-10 14:09:45

Jo wrote:

uri wrote:
AND NOW ATTENTION PLEASE!
The most stupid Sixty-Four Thousend Dollar Question. Who knows it?
Why Ruby is called Ruby?
Do you have to know the german language to understand the analogy I am thinking you refer to...?

Probably, educate me, why is she called Ruby.

And while I'm at it, Ruby is unreal, just joined, downloaded her, and am most impressed.

I would sell my soul to be with a girl like that.

ruby · 2006-03-13 23:50:56

ok here we go a few reasons some more questions and a whole lotta spunk!
first- my name on ba and ism is ruby cause its a abbreviation of my middle name rubina.

At AW the staff assign names to models and i was given nona which i kinda like....! Of course neither is my real name. As I presume non of my fellow BA fans use their real names of the forum. Oh the Internet! Be who ever you want to be

its good to have a double alias, it means that I can get away with double trouble

I have done a fair bit of work for AW lately a few videoswhich I watched the edited version of yesterday. Nice stuff! I was impressed with myself especially the bootay shake scene. I havent seen myself dance on film yet- and have a renewed appreciation for the form (dance on fim that is).

I am doing a dance scene in a short film for the 1515 festival on Saturday which should be wikkid- not sure it it will be nude but it will be some dancehall and some krump (for those of you that dont know what krump is check david lachapelle film Rize)

DocDarkside · 2006-03-14 05:22:00

I find it interesting that your Mum did nude modeling... in my experience, art is generationally enhanced. In my family, music is the milieu. In yours, something else, but unquestionably art. Your Mum, now you. Cool. Rock on , g/f.

Garybobs · 2006-03-14 07:32:05

Art!

PC elmo · 2006-03-16 06:57:03

... Yes!

PC elmo · 2006-03-16 07:04:25

I actually got an error message for trying to post that too quickly!!! That's a first, especially for me!

Hmm, but since I am using up another post here to say that, I guess I could add this: I'm curious, Ruby, what effect your Mum's decisions had on your own -- did her background enhance your art, as DocDarkside suggests, or have you been discovering your specialties all on your own? (And I take it she's encouraging?)

ruby · 2006-03-16 09:37:17

well to a certain extend she is encouraging of the life modelling that i do- the internet for her still seems too porn! you know oldies can't keep up with the times

of course my upbringing influenced my decisions and experience of life.

i think that the two of us differ on one important point though:

she would see life modelling as an artistic expression

i see ba, ism etc as a sexual expression!

ruby xo

Garybobs · 2006-03-16 17:57:27

Chuckling in troll-ville!!

DocDarkside · 2006-03-21 06:44:59

ruby.. sexual expression, artistic expression.. I'm not sure the difference is all that it might be cracked up to be, as it were..

ruby · 2006-03-25 08:36:22

doc its all about the intention!

NWarner · 2006-04-10 01:38:38

This is in reply to the... second post on this thread.. I believe the post was from Garybobs. My apologies for how late it comes, I've only recently discovered here.

Art can be anything, but most arguably relevant, can be depicted by showing an individual at their most intimate, emotional -- vulnerable. Art is tasteful, derived through opinion. Art is anything that has a deeper meaning, whether that meaning is solely understood by the artist, or understood by the audience also. It is the audience who themselves diminish the quality of art by degrading it, treating it as though it were something it is not. Art is beyond the surface, baring that vulnerability to which few can derive from their own souls, creating something which speaks without words or thoughts. If anyone could simply do this, without effort, thought, or loss, art would be meaningless. She has given up a piece of herself, her intimacy, her vulnerability, her emotion, to the world.

Notably, she is not performing the sexual act in a public arena, she is performing a sexual act in private, later expressing it in the context of art in a public arena.

To be blunt: I would want her to be the mother of my grandchildrens parents, even without watching the video, seeing her face, or hearing her voice, because she has done something that few can truly understand, that even less could achieve, and that an imperceptible handful will appreciate in its most raw depth. Will I call this statement as a blanket to everyone here? No. Is she special? Yes.

I take offence in reading your derogatory gambit averring that the art contained herein is actually porn. Does our sense of morality openly condemn sexual activity outside of a bed with covers? Are we civilized because we distance ourselves from animals and their behaviours, yet arguably still endorse the behaviour, with ethical restrictions? Does assuming a stance of righteousness give one the right to speak condescendingly?

I can say, that easily, more than 50% of the populace masterbates more than once in their lifetime. Its natural, healthy, and beautiful. The stigmas attached are part of an old boys club which cannot seem to accept that the views of the world are changing. What may be art tomorrow may not be today, what may be accepted today may not be tomorrow.

Our sexuality is something that we should share, that we shouldnt feel ashamed of, and that we should educate others on. Imagine how many children grow up with psychological problems because of what they were told in their youth about sexuality? How many of them will in turn pass those fallacies on to their future children? I cant even begin to think of the abuse which is caused because of values which arent that germane. To be blunt oncemore, even in public, were still naked beneath our robes, dont act as if were not.

As a final wrap-up of my reply to the second post..
Life of debauchery? Are you serious? Im speechless as to how offensive, derogatory, and demeaning that is, especially in this forum. This only goes to further the old boys club adage, where if youre not a proper lady, youre not a lady at all. Disgusting.

I cant even begin to further comment on the hypocritical messages within this thread It fills my heart with sorrow to know that such art is not understood, let alone appreciated as art. As a message to the artist(s), No true artist understood the contributions they gave in their lifetime.. Only now do we honestly credit them with the admiration they deserve.

kirkpa · 2006-04-10 02:44:48

Get the Bees ready

#51 2006-02-17 17:35:01

Re: After #3 I only have one Question - Ruby will you marry me??

#52 2006-02-18 20:40:28

Re: After #3 I only have one Question - Ruby will you marry me??

#53 2006-02-21 18:54:31

Re: After #3 I only have one Question - Ruby will you marry me??

#54 2006-02-22 03:10:02

Re: After #3 I only have one Question - Ruby will you marry me??

#55 2006-03-02 04:52:28

Re: After #3 I only have one Question - Ruby will you marry me??

#56 2006-03-05 19:16:58

Re: After #3 I only have one Question - Ruby will you marry me??

#57 2006-03-05 19:22:29

Re: After #3 I only have one Question - Ruby will you marry me??

#58 2006-03-06 05:40:42

Re: After #3 I only have one Question - Ruby will you marry me??

#59 2006-03-06 05:56:22

Re: After #3 I only have one Question - Ruby will you marry me??

#60 2006-03-06 18:57:38

Re: After #3 I only have one Question - Ruby will you marry me??

#61 2006-03-07 06:06:04

Re: After #3 I only have one Question - Ruby will you marry me??

#62 2006-03-10 13:35:57

Re: After #3 I only have one Question - Ruby will you marry me??

#63 2006-03-10 13:53:01

Re: After #3 I only have one Question - Ruby will you marry me??

#64 2006-03-10 14:09:45

Re: After #3 I only have one Question - Ruby will you marry me??

#65 2006-03-13 23:50:56

Re: After #3 I only have one Question - Ruby will you marry me??

#66 2006-03-14 05:22:00

Re: After #3 I only have one Question - Ruby will you marry me??

#67 2006-03-14 07:32:05

Re: After #3 I only have one Question - Ruby will you marry me??

#68 2006-03-16 06:57:03

Re: After #3 I only have one Question - Ruby will you marry me??

#69 2006-03-16 07:04:25

Re: After #3 I only have one Question - Ruby will you marry me??

#70 2006-03-16 09:37:17

Re: After #3 I only have one Question - Ruby will you marry me??

#71 2006-03-16 17:57:27

Re: After #3 I only have one Question - Ruby will you marry me??

#72 2006-03-21 06:44:59

Re: After #3 I only have one Question - Ruby will you marry me??

#73 2006-03-25 08:36:22

Re: After #3 I only have one Question - Ruby will you marry me??

#74 2006-04-10 01:38:38

Re: After #3 I only have one Question - Ruby will you marry me??

#75 2006-04-10 02:44:48

Re: After #3 I only have one Question - Ruby will you marry me??

Board footer