announcing orgasm

Fedor1 · 2006-03-02 05:17:54

Is it just me or is #477 the first agony to actually say "I'm Cumming" during orgasm?

lauren · 2006-03-02 05:21:55

ALSO MS#273 & MR#7

Fedor1 · 2006-03-03 01:08:08

Thank you Lauren #273 does qualify and I will trust you on Mr. 7, but still only 3 out of close to 500 seems like a small percentage.

uri · 2006-03-03 11:08:39

0273!!!...Oh yes and her deep sonorous Latina voice turns me crazy!

dauphinb · 2006-03-03 14:47:47

Fedor1 wrote:

Thank you Lauren #273 does qualify and I will trust you on Mr. 7, but still only 3 out of close to 500 seems like a small percentage.

I can't list numbers like some folks here, but my gut feeling is it's more than just 3, over the whole set of vids.

At the risk of bumming out those who don't like "forensic analysis" ;^), I've been thinking lately about what clues there are to the presence/participation of a partner. It seems to me that announcing orgasm and certain other verbalizations (esp. all forms of "yes!") are far more likely when there's someone else in the room. Nothing's absolute, of course, and some agonists seem to explicitly treat the camera like another "person" in the room... but on balance, I suspect solitary agonists are more likely to make non-verbal sounds that convey their passion in a more direct way.

Thoughts anyone?

Bishop Of Bath & Wells · 2006-03-03 18:05:40

I agree that people tend to be far more vocal and expressive when there is another person involved, almost as a form of encouragement I guess.

Bish

Jakeview · 2006-03-03 21:22:26

And any announcement by a solo Agonee may be a way of including you, the viewer, as their partner. Maybe?

billykid · 2006-03-03 21:25:50

Another "announcer" is Ms. 407 (at 3:48), though it's barely audible...

Last edited by billykid (2006-03-03 21:26:56)

Fedor1 · 2006-03-04 00:11:45

I agree that it is more likely to hear an announcement with a partner ( it is helpful when my wife does so during intercourse ), but there are plenty of vids that involve a partner.

erdna · 2006-03-04 05:43:03

I disagree that people talking when they have their agony is a sign of a partner's presence. Talking can be self stimulating when alone. Orgasm is a moment of complete "letting go". You have not too much control on your speech if you are the vocal type. On the other hand there are many videos with obvious partner's presence and where the agonees stay completely silent.

dauphinb · 2006-03-04 19:12:18

erdna wrote:

I disagree that people talking when they have their agony is a sign of a partner's presence.

I don't suggest it's a *definitive* sign, only that it's more likely. In a few cases, it seems to me the agonist's "yes" is a matter of giving direction/encouragement to a partner; in some other cases it could well be simply a matter of losing themselves in the moment, as you say.

Announcing orgasm ("I'm coming!"), OTOH, strikes me to be far more likely than "yes!" or "Oh, God!" to indicate the presence of a partner... or perhaps consciously including the camera as a virtual partner. Perhaps it's just a failure of imagination on my part, but I don't guess too many people shout out that they're coming when they're involved in solitary masturbation.

dauphinb · 2006-03-04 19:27:26

erdna wrote:

...there are many videos with obvious partner's presence and where the agonees stay completely silent.

I have the impression that some agonists believe they're supposed to hide the presence of a partner. In a couple cases (and again, I can't quote clip numbers), I think I've caught clipped, quick instructions to the partner to keep quiet or make sure to stay out of shot.

For myself, awareness of a partner in some of these vids is "a feature, not a bug," and I don't think the agonists should worry about hiding it. I'm glad there are solo clips as well, but knowing there's a partner involved is never a bad thing, IMHO.

erdna · 2006-03-05 05:26:45

dauphinb, thanks for reacting to my post. To come back to the subject I really prefer when the agonees are honest and openly indicate or at least do not try to hide the fact a partner is with them, helping or not. What I don't like is when an agonee pretends to be alone when she is not. The most honest pair on BA is #249 and #250.
Also about being vocal, when they are doing their agonies: a good example is OV0086 our only FBA. This girl is very vocal and I am sure she is alone. Our girl from Spain Ms#273 is alone too and very vocal.

dauphinb · 2006-03-06 06:05:19

erdna wrote:

I really prefer when the agonees are honest and openly indicate or at least do not try to hide the fact a partner is with them, helping or not.

Well, there's something we can definitely agree on!

erdna wrote:

What I don't like is when an agonee pretends to be alone when she is not.

I don't think the ones who try to hide partners are being dishonest, per se: My impression is that they think they're *supposed* to hide them. And to be fair, there may be others who don't share your and my enthusiasm for "extra" participants. I suppose there might be folks whose kick is thinking they're peeking in on a very private moment; for them, extra people might be a bummer.

To each his own, eh?

PC elmo · 2006-03-06 07:24:10

billykid wrote:

Another "announcer" is Ms. 407 (at 3:48), though it's barely audible...

There is also Ms #388, who doesn't use that exact phrase but does broadcast her impending O, just before she nearly spasms herself right off the bed.

Garybobs · 2006-03-06 19:06:55

Jakeview wrote:

And any announcement by a solo Agonee may be a way of including you, the viewer, as their partner. Maybe?

Very interesting angle Jakie. Hadn't thought of that one. Good observation.

edgeman3583566 · 2006-03-11 01:19:29

How about #383 at 3:54. Just the word "cumming", then hang on!

Fedor1 · 2006-03-12 14:13:27

Nice catch edgeman, but it is much quieter than even #407, which is described as barely audible. I think that #383 falls short of an announcement, but I appreciate you bringing it to my attention nonetheless.

PC elmo · 2006-03-16 06:51:49

And check out Ms #448's Overkill. It's not that the face change doesn't totally give it away, but she also lets out a little "f*k!!" right as she falls into it.

nickandrobin · 2006-04-22 01:24:40

Here in the States, we usually blurt a series of "OH FUCK"s during orgasm. We've attended numerous swing clubs and parties over the years, and have seen almost everyone else who is in sexual ecstasy also verbalize their orgasms with vocal flair. I dunno.. is loud sex just an "American Thing"?

Iso · 2006-04-22 04:48:07

nickandrobin wrote:

Here in the States, we usually blurt a series of "OH FUCK"s during orgasm. We've attended numerous swing clubs and parties over the years, and have seen almost everyone else who is in sexual ecstasy also verbalize their orgasms with vocal flair. I dunno.. is loud sex just an "American Thing"?

From Seattle, WA - Something akin to seagulls attacking a fog horn.

elfman11 · 2006-04-22 08:23:34

nickandrobin wrote:

Here in the States, we usually blurt a series of "OH FUCK"s during orgasm. We've attended numerous swing clubs and parties over the years, and have seen almost everyone else who is in sexual ecstasy also verbalize their orgasms with vocal flair. I dunno.. is loud sex just an "American Thing"?

I thought Americans were just loud about everything

Whilst I'm extracting the urine from my transatlantic cousins (only joking guys) I came across this screen saver the other day which tickled me. (If George gets stuck left click on him with your mouse and pull him free).

www.planetdan.net/pics/misc/georgie.htm

My apologies to any George Bush supporters this offends. (Well someone must have voted for him)

Elfman.

Last edited by elfman11 (2006-04-22 09:02:23)

Fedor1 · 2006-04-22 13:53:45

Unfortunately, a lot of people voted for Bush here. I would like to apologize to every non-american on our behalf for this.
There is no excuse, we should have known better.
I could explain to you about how a man named Karl Rove was able to manipulate us, but plenty of information was readily available for us to make a more informed decision and we didn't.
Sorry.

elfman11 · 2006-04-22 14:53:47

Fedor1 wrote:

Unfortunately, a lot of people voted for Bush here. I would like to apologize to every non-american on our behalf for this.
There is no excuse, we should have known better.
I could explain to you about how a man named Karl Rove was able to manipulate us, but plenty of information was readily available for us to make a more informed decision and we didn't.
Sorry.

We Brits can't criticise you Fedor1. We kept Margaret Thatcher in office for 18 years.

Elfman.

Last edited by elfman11 (2006-04-22 14:54:32)

kurvenal · 2006-04-22 15:45:55

Speaking of our infamous GW Bush, there is what I think is an exceptionally interesting article about him on http://www.commondreams.org

It's written by John Dean, the prominent Watergate scandal figure. The article is based on a political science research paper that analyses all US presidents through George Bush I and suggests George Bush II's future behavior in office. (May the deities be with us wherever we may reside!)

And about Mrs. Thatcher, I hated her politics but my oh my could that woman speak. I did admire the way she used the English language and the sound of her lovely speakling voice. But her speeches, imo, didn't approach the power of Mr. Churchill's.

#1 2006-03-02 05:17:54

announcing orgasm

#2 2006-03-02 05:21:55

Re: announcing orgasm

#3 2006-03-03 01:08:08

Re: announcing orgasm

#4 2006-03-03 11:08:39

Re: announcing orgasm

#5 2006-03-03 14:47:47

Re: announcing orgasm

#6 2006-03-03 18:05:40

Re: announcing orgasm

#7 2006-03-03 21:22:26

Re: announcing orgasm

#8 2006-03-03 21:25:50

Re: announcing orgasm

#9 2006-03-04 00:11:45

Re: announcing orgasm

#10 2006-03-04 05:43:03

Re: announcing orgasm

#11 2006-03-04 19:12:18

Re: announcing orgasm

#12 2006-03-04 19:27:26

Re: announcing orgasm

#13 2006-03-05 05:26:45

Re: announcing orgasm

#14 2006-03-06 06:05:19

Re: announcing orgasm

#15 2006-03-06 07:24:10

Re: announcing orgasm

#16 2006-03-06 19:06:55

Re: announcing orgasm

#17 2006-03-11 01:19:29

Re: announcing orgasm

#18 2006-03-12 14:13:27

Re: announcing orgasm

#19 2006-03-16 06:51:49

Re: announcing orgasm

#20 2006-04-22 01:24:40

Re: announcing orgasm

#21 2006-04-22 04:48:07

Re: announcing orgasm

#22 2006-04-22 08:23:34

Re: announcing orgasm

#23 2006-04-22 13:53:45

Re: announcing orgasm

#24 2006-04-22 14:53:47

Re: announcing orgasm

#25 2006-04-22 15:45:55

Re: announcing orgasm

Board footer