OVERKILL Explanation.

Jo · 2006-01-21 15:10:24

erdna wrote:

Jo, just review the numerous comments and discussions on this forum in favour of FBA. This is a good sample of the whole membership and statistically, I can say the majority is for it.

ok erdna, as there are more than 10000 registered users to this forum (and I guess MUCH more (!) to the main page, 100 pro-statements for an FBA is for sure the majority!

Think about to buy a new calculator!

exhausted · 2006-01-21 23:15:30

richard wrote:

Bishop Of Bath & Wells wrote:
Bishop Of Bath & Wells wrote:
Hi, I was wondering if the new project is still progressing on schedule? I, and I suspect many others on here, are very anticipative of this new upcoming site, if it is even half as wonderful as BA then we're all in for a treat!
PS I hope the name of the new site doesn't follow the pattern set by the first two............'Beautiful Agony' and 'I Shot Myself' both sound like necro sites, not to mention the 'Overkill' section!
Bish
No response, then ..............they really are a secretive lot at BA, aren't they? Oh well!
Bish
Sorry, I didn't see this post until today. The site is coming along well and an introductory version should be running by Feb. It won't be very sophisticated technically at first, that will come later, but I can tell you that we have plenty of material and some of it is amongst the most erotic imagery I've ever seen. We'll keep you posted, literally.

Any discount for BA subscribers then ??

PC elmo · 2006-01-23 00:40:11

exhausted wrote:

Any discount for BA subscribers then ??

Yeah, that's a good idea! It should probably be mutual -- i.e., belonging to both sites. Every bit helps!

Bishop Of Bath & Wells · 2006-02-10 23:00:43

PC elmo wrote:

exhausted wrote:
Any discount for BA subscribers then ??
Yeah, that's a good idea! It should probably be mutual -- i.e., belonging to both sites. Every bit helps!

I'm pretty sure when ISM first appeared, they offered discounted introductory memberships to AW subscribers. Perhaps the same might be applied to the new site, e.g. existing BA or ISM members are eligible to a discounted membership for say the first three months of the new site, to help give it a bit of a push?

Bish

richard · 2006-02-11 04:58:23

Bishop Of Bath & Wells wrote:

PC elmo wrote:
exhausted wrote:
Any discount for BA subscribers then ??
Yeah, that's a good idea! It should probably be mutual -- i.e., belonging to both sites. Every bit helps!
I'm pretty sure when ISM first appeared, they offered discounted introductory memberships to AW subscribers. Perhaps the same might be applied to the new site, e.g. existing BA or ISM members are eligible to a discounted membership for say the first three months of the new site, to help give it a bit of a push?
Bish

There'll be an opening discount for all subscribers, since the archives will be pretty lean at first. Once we're established we will probably offer a cross-site discount.

Bishop Of Bath & Wells · 2006-02-20 23:22:37

richard wrote:

The site is coming along well and an introductory version should be running by Feb. It won't be very sophisticated technically at first, that will come later, but I can tell you that we have plenty of material and some of it is amongst the most erotic imagery I've ever seen.

I know I'm going to come across as being horribly impatient (not my intention, honest!), but how is this new site coming along? Only about another week of February left now.

Just being nosey.

Bish

splat · 2006-02-21 21:46:48

I know I'm going to come across as being horribly impatient (not my intention, honest!), but how is this new site coming along? Only about another week of February left now.
Bish

Tease for the next overkill looks like it could be an annoucement for the new site.

Full body anyway

Bishop Of Bath & Wells · 2006-02-21 22:03:07

Over on the ISM forum, Liandra has announced the name of the new site as TOP SECRET URL

Bish

PC elmo · 2006-02-25 05:50:02

I clicked on that link, and since the new site isn't up yet, it just has a preview screen, which has some background artwork and the caption:

{ I'll post this observation again, after the site is finished ... }

I don't know if that was intentional on the part of the architects, but if so that's a "stroke of genius," so to speak!

Last edited by PC elmo (2006-03-03 20:33:59)

richard · 2006-02-25 08:32:32

Bishop Of Bath & Wells wrote:

richard wrote:
The site is coming along well and an introductory version should be running by Feb. It won't be very sophisticated technically at first, that will come later, but I can tell you that we have plenty of material and some of it is amongst the most erotic imagery I've ever seen.
I know I'm going to come across as being horribly impatient (not my intention, honest!), but how is this new site coming along? Only about another week of February left now.
Just being nosey.
Bish

If not this week, then very soon after.

elfman11 · 2006-02-25 12:00:25

Richard.

For us new comers to BA could you give some new detail on the new site please?

Thanks for BA incidentaly. It is lovely.

Elfman11

richard · 2006-02-25 13:07:10

elfman11 wrote:

Richard.
For us new comers to BA could you give some new detail on the new site please?
Thanks for BA incidentaly. It is lovely.
Elfman11

Well make an announcement here in a week or two.

Jakeview · 2006-02-25 21:08:41

richard wrote:

I can tell you that we have plenty of material and some of it is amongst the most erotic imagery I've ever seen.

Great to hear! Looking forward to your announcement.

Jake

johnp54 · 2006-02-26 00:48:39

I wonder if this Liandra has any relations with another site called Abby Something?

Bishop Of Bath & Wells · 2006-02-26 12:11:00

johnp54 wrote:

I wonder if this Liandra has any relations with another site called Abby Something?

Well, she has done some work for Abby if that's what you mean. I understand that AW have their office situated close to BA/ISM, so there's always likely to be a certain amount of overlap in terms of personnel.

Bish

johnp54 · 2006-02-26 18:47:37

"Sorry, I didn't see this post until today. The site is coming along well and an introductory version should be running by Feb"

OK! Febuary has almost come and gone, where can I find this "introductory version?"

johnp54 · 2006-02-26 18:53:17

From what I understand, Bish, is that they used to be housed all in the same building at one time, with AW having moved to another location within the same city. Either way, I'm looking forward to this new FBA site

Bishop Of Bath & Wells · 2006-02-26 20:53:09

johnp54 wrote:

OK! Febuary has almost come and gone, where can I find this "introductory version?"

Well I mentioned the site address on one of my previous posts a couple of days ago, but Bossman Richard has scrubbed it out so I better respect his wishes. Needless to say, it looks very exciting.

johnp54 wrote:

From what I understand, Bish, is that they used to be housed all in the same building at one time, with AW having moved to another location within the same city. Either way, I'm looking forward to this new FBA site

That makes two of us! You can chat with Liandra on the forums at ISM and AW, although you might need to be a member beforehand. She's a lovely girl, very down-to-earth and chatty.

Bish

johnp54 · 2006-02-27 02:07:41

Could you e-mail the site address to me , Bish, or has it been taken down already?

bsangrandpa2 · 2006-02-27 12:53:06

I'm not familiar with "WA." Help please?

elfman11 · 2006-02-27 14:24:57

AW refers to Abbywinters.com. Another Australian site which again specialises in typical australian girls rather than using professional porn stars. It is a nice site but loses out to this one in my humble opinion mostly because it lacks the simplicity of BA's fundamental philosophy of no nudity, head and shoulders only with the participants staging and filming their own submissions.

Bishop Of Bath & Wells · 2006-02-27 19:52:35

elfman11 wrote:

AW refers to Abbywinters.com. Another Australian site which again specialises in typical australian girls rather than using professional porn stars. It is a nice site but loses out to this one in my humble opinion mostly because it lacks the simplicity of BA's fundamental philosophy of no nudity, head and shoulders only with the participants staging and filming their own submissions.

Or put another way, AW is a straight-ahead porn site (though very tasteful with excellent production standards) whilst BA is, erm..........an experiment in erotic art?

Bish

Bishop Of Bath & Wells · 2006-02-27 19:59:05

johnp54 wrote:

Could you e-mail the site address to me , Bish, or has it been taken down already?

Well I could, but I don't really want to p*ss Richard or Lauren off. Richard removed the url on one of my previous posts, so I guess for the time being they want it to stay under wraps.

What I can say is that it looks very exciting, I'd describe it as a sort of widescreen version of BA, but certainly more explicit.

Bish

bsangrandpa2 · 2006-02-27 20:57:07

Tx for the info re AW. I did take a peek, and must agree with Bish that is frankly porn. I'm afraid that BA has raised the bar impossibly high, and plain old porn has no appeal after BA. I'm certain that the new FBA site will retain all of the charm, but leave a little less to the imagination.

al · 2006-02-28 16:53:11

What I miss in BA is some kind of porn-ish-ness. Other sites have action. This site has conclusion. I'd be fascinated if Richard could merge these concepts.

#26 2006-01-21 15:10:24

Re: OVERKILL Explanation.

#27 2006-01-21 23:15:30

Re: OVERKILL Explanation.

#28 2006-01-23 00:40:11

Re: OVERKILL Explanation.

#29 2006-02-10 23:00:43

Re: OVERKILL Explanation.

#30 2006-02-11 04:58:23

Re: OVERKILL Explanation.

#31 2006-02-20 23:22:37

Re: OVERKILL Explanation.

#32 2006-02-21 21:46:48

Re: OVERKILL Explanation.

#33 2006-02-21 22:03:07

Re: OVERKILL Explanation.

#34 2006-02-25 05:50:02

Re: OVERKILL Explanation.

#35 2006-02-25 08:32:32

Re: OVERKILL Explanation.

#36 2006-02-25 12:00:25

Re: OVERKILL Explanation.

#37 2006-02-25 13:07:10

Re: OVERKILL Explanation.

#38 2006-02-25 21:08:41

Re: OVERKILL Explanation.

#39 2006-02-26 00:48:39

Re: OVERKILL Explanation.

#40 2006-02-26 12:11:00

Re: OVERKILL Explanation.

#41 2006-02-26 18:47:37

Re: OVERKILL Explanation.

#42 2006-02-26 18:53:17

Re: OVERKILL Explanation.

#43 2006-02-26 20:53:09

Re: OVERKILL Explanation.

#44 2006-02-27 02:07:41

Re: OVERKILL Explanation.

#45 2006-02-27 12:53:06

Re: OVERKILL Explanation.

#46 2006-02-27 14:24:57

Re: OVERKILL Explanation.

#47 2006-02-27 19:52:35

Re: OVERKILL Explanation.

#48 2006-02-27 19:59:05

Re: OVERKILL Explanation.

#49 2006-02-27 20:57:07

Re: OVERKILL Explanation.

#50 2006-02-28 16:53:11

Re: OVERKILL Explanation.

Board footer