cum flying no where?

kevinme · 2005-12-30 05:03:55

I love the site and wouldn't change a thing, except maybe to be able to rate the vids. My problem is, none of the guys I've seen pop in their face. Do the ones that do get declined? Having cum hit you in your face when you orgasm is part of the beautiful agony experience. No cum flies on their chests, hands come up dry. Makes it all seem faked for an acting class assingment.

Garybob · 2005-12-30 05:59:20

I'm not touching this one!

Tellin · 2005-12-30 08:41:36

Me neither!

Nowaysis · 2005-12-30 11:48:40

deatherm wrote:

I love the site and wouldn't change a thing, except maybe to be able to rate the vids. My problem is, none of the guys I've seen pop in their face. Do the ones that do get declined? Having cum hit you in your face when you orgasm is part of the beautiful agony experience. No cum flies on their chests, hands come up dry. Makes it all seem faked for an acting class assingment.

Yes, because we all know the penis can't be aimed anywhere else than the face.

All jokes aside, it's not exactly hard to position yourself, the camera, and your penis so that no ejaculate ever appears on screen.

kirkpa · 2005-12-30 12:04:29

Hey There is a Overkill a boy and girl the guy pops on his face they both laugh after

kevinme · 2005-12-30 12:29:37

it naturally shoots up and on to your stomach, chest, shoulders, and face. you'd have to aim not to, and typically you are not aiming.

It couldn't be more natural for it to shoot up over your shoulder and on to your pillow, etc. It just surprises me that it doesn't in any of them.

PC elmo · 2005-12-30 21:28:37

kirkpa wrote:

Hey There is a Overkill a boy and girl the guy pops on his face they both laugh after

Yes, that's OV0009, from July '04. He gets some in her hair, too.

I'm not sure what the appeal is, deatherm, but I think you've partly answered that. There is discussion in numerous places elsewhere in the forum about -- with women -- how we can be sure an orgasm actually occurred.

As far as the mechanics of positioning for the camera, etc., to truly know we'd have to hear from someone who's done it. I can imagine many possibilities, though, where even somebody who usually shoots a great distance wouldn't get any in view of the camera, not the least of which is using a condom.

In your original post you suggested that submissions which do include this may be rejected. I somehow doubt this, and I don't think it would be right if they are. There really isn't an equivalent for women, but we do get to hear whatever the camera captures, including some squirting and sloshing around. So long as it's not the main focus (and maybe even if it is), I think the appearance of bodily fluids is very different from nudity.

Nowaysis · 2005-12-30 23:02:51

deatherm wrote:

it naturally shoots up and on to your stomach, chest, shoulders, and face. you'd have to aim not to, and typically you are not aiming.
It couldn't be more natural for it to shoot up over your shoulder and on to your pillow, etc. It just surprises me that it doesn't in any of them.

Well, news flash then. Not all men like to come on themselves (my typical "post orgasmic anti-sex attitude" includes a certain dislike for ejaculate), and not all men find it hard to aim somewhere else.

I personally never come on my stomach, and it doesn't exactly take a lot of effort to keep from doing so. If we must be graphic, I actually prefer to angle the organ in question away from my body because I like the tension doing so creates.

The actual question you asked I find very interesting however. Are there any rules for how much sperm, if any, is allowed on screen? Kirkpa and PC elmo mentioned the OV with the couple where he manages to hit both himself and his girlfriend, but that's pretty tame in my opinion, as far as I remember there's only like one or two little gobs visible on screen. I personally haven't watched any of the male agonies (except for the couples and those embedded in the film festival clip), but what if someone sat down with the camera right in front of himself, and shot straight up i the air, or onto his stomach/chest, with every shot in plain view (or is there already such an agony on the site)?

Please pardon my graphic language, but it's hard to stay away from considering the subject matter.

kevinme · 2005-12-31 14:20:25

I agree Nowaysis you have to try not to come in that direction much of the time. As for me, I dont like to try and do anything that might distract me from the moment.

Anyway, problem solved. Thanks for pointing out the clip kirkpa and PC elmo. Beautiful!!! I will add it to my favorites.

For the record, I take back my comment about rating videos. Ratings wouldnt be in the spirit of the site.

Jo · 2006-01-05 20:13:50

deatherm wrote:

...none of the guys I've seen pop in their face. Do the ones that do get declined?

PC elmo wrote:

So long as it's not the main focus (and maybe even if it is), I think the appearance of bodily fluids is very different from nudity.

I also asked myself if mens vids will be rejected because of the analogy to existing porn sites, where the focus is too much on the cum-thing.

I for my part like to lick my fingers and taste myself after coming, but wondered if this would be a exclusion criteria for this site?!

A question that lauren maybe will bring in some light!

lauren · 2006-01-05 23:49:28

Jo wrote:

I for my part like to lick my fingers and taste myself after coming, but wondered if this would be a exclusion criteria for this site?!

This would not be an exclusion criteria, if it was accompanied by a running commentary of "fuck yeah, oh yeah, fuck me, harder, oh baby you make me so hard, oh oh, fuck yeah..." or something along those lines then maybe, ha ha... but seriously here, a friend of mine (who is on the site), on his first attempt of agony, did shoot straight into his eye, he was terribly embarrased about it and rather than submit the tape as it was he taped over it with another. I suspect this happens quite a bit. We have had guys lick there palms during, fingers afterwards, and yes eat it, (although i couldn't bring myself to show you that tape), you'll all just have to trust me on that one, no really!! Truth is there actually haven't been many of these types of tapes submitted, I would say that like my friend, they re-shoot rather than submit it as is maybe.

There isn't a lot that i would hold back on showing you though, I'm reasonably open to everything.

erdna · 2006-01-07 06:27:24

Lauren, open to everything but reasonably, OK. I generally look only at the girls on BA but if we want to establish fair standards, well if the girls taste themselves we should also allow the men to do the same. However, I think it all depends on how the gesture is made. If the intention is one of being crude (and that shows up) OK to cut it out. If the gesture is purely passionate, I would say keep it. It can also be a gesture of daring or humor, in that case keep it too. What do you think?

Your story about that unfortunate man makes me think about having a target for this purpose Ok guys who will hit the bulleye first :)

Jo · 2006-01-12 20:31:44

lauren wrote:

This would not be an exclusion criteria, if it was accompanied by a running commentary of "fuck yeah, oh yeah, fuck me, harder, oh baby you make me so hard, oh oh, fuck yeah..." or something along those lines...

I like your sort of humour!

(But not everybody seems to understand)

lauren · 2006-01-12 23:14:47

erdna wrote:

However, I think it all depends on how the gesture is made. If the intention is one of being crude (and that shows up) OK to cut it out. If the gesture is purely passionate, I would say keep it. It can also be a gesture of daring or humor, in that case keep it too.

I would agree with you 100% erdna. xo

erdna · 2006-01-13 05:33:42

Lauren, I always knew I could go along with you quite well. Sorry but what's the meaning of xo at the end of your post? On a bottle of whisky it means "extra old".

lauren · 2006-01-13 07:25:39

thats a definate hug and a kiss erdna.

erdna · 2006-01-15 05:48:53

Thanks Lauren, I can almost feel it ... ... BTW I saw your presentation of the book named "FACES" on Overkill. I read the book excerpt. Interesting and the author quotes BA several times. Good for you up there. I am sure that very soon, more and more people and newspapers and TV will speak about BA. BA is unique and it's a matter of weeks or months before the media will ask you BA people for interviews if it's not already done. Do you know by any chance Juliet Hastings books? I like them. Classy but quite hot.

dougbtn · 2006-01-29 01:04:13

What actually happens is that there is a certain Ms Lewinski waiting in the wings with an old frock she has no further use for

Judethe · 2006-02-06 06:04:12

deatherm wrote:

I love the site and wouldn't change a thing. My problem is, none of the guys I've seen pop in their face... Having cum hit you in your face when you orgasm is part of the beautiful agony experience. No cum flies on their chests, hands come up dry.

I agree, deatherm! And I have had a few partners express surprise at my "ability" to shoot far... but I did a bit of research (ie, I asked my Dr) and he said it was down to a muscle in the base of one's penis..this is one of the determiners in how far one can spread one's joy...(another one is the level of sexual excitement). So I realize it's not an ability at all, but a physical thing... having said all that.. I would love to see an artist or two "pop in their face"...

Garybob · 2006-02-07 05:00:37

Jo wrote:

deatherm wrote:
...none of the guys I've seen pop in their face. Do the ones that do get declined?
PC elmo wrote:
So long as it's not the main focus (and maybe even if it is), I think the appearance of bodily fluids is very different from nudity.
I also asked myself if mens vids will be rejected because of the analogy to existing porn sites, where the focus is too much on the cum-thing.
I for my part like to lick my fingers and taste myself after coming, but wondered if this would be a exclusion criteria for this site?!
A question that lauren maybe will bring in some light!

Well I'll be Got Dayumed! Ain't this some sh-t! I am now headed for the porcelin throne for a little BARF TIME!!!

PC elmo · 2006-02-07 17:11:02

Garybob wrote:

Well I'll be Got Dayumed! Ain't this some sh-t! I am now headed for the porcelin throne for a little BARF TIME!!!

Scandalous!

You should videotape it. Then you could sell it to one of those "other" sites.

deathermf · 2006-02-08 03:48:16

No need to worry, Garybob. You've convinced us you are straight, er, uh, why are you following this thread again? ;-)

Garybob · 2006-02-08 21:02:33

deathermf wrote:

No need to worry, Garybob. You've convinced us you are straight

And quite homophobic too!!

Garybob · 2006-02-08 21:05:25

PC elmo wrote:

Garybob wrote:
Well I'll be Got Dayumed! Ain't this some sh-t! I am now headed for the porcelin throne for a little BARF TIME!!!
Scandalous!
You should videotape it. Then you could sell it to one of those "other" sites.

Elmo:

Please help me out here. Exactly when was it that I pissed you off so much? What I thought was a simple exchange of ideas and thoughts has now and quite suddenly turned into a slam-fest.

I come in peace my brother.

Judethe · 2006-02-09 07:47:48

Garybob wrote:

deathermf wrote:
No need to worry, Garybob. You've convinced us you are straight
And quite homophobic too!!

you know, don't you Garybob, that a phobia is a fear of something...?...

#1 2005-12-30 05:03:55

cum flying no where?

#2 2005-12-30 05:59:20

Re: cum flying no where?

#3 2005-12-30 08:41:36

Re: cum flying no where?

#4 2005-12-30 11:48:40

Re: cum flying no where?

#5 2005-12-30 12:04:29

Re: cum flying no where?

#6 2005-12-30 12:29:37

Re: cum flying no where?

#7 2005-12-30 21:28:37

Re: cum flying no where?

#8 2005-12-30 23:02:51

Re: cum flying no where?

#9 2005-12-31 14:20:25

Re: cum flying no where?

#10 2006-01-05 20:13:50

Re: cum flying no where?

#11 2006-01-05 23:49:28

Re: cum flying no where?

#12 2006-01-07 06:27:24

Re: cum flying no where?

#13 2006-01-12 20:31:44

Re: cum flying no where?

#14 2006-01-12 23:14:47

Re: cum flying no where?

#15 2006-01-13 05:33:42

Re: cum flying no where?

#16 2006-01-13 07:25:39

Re: cum flying no where?

#17 2006-01-15 05:48:53

Re: cum flying no where?

#18 2006-01-29 01:04:13

Re: cum flying no where?

#19 2006-02-06 06:04:12

Re: cum flying no where?

#20 2006-02-07 05:00:37

Re: cum flying no where?

#21 2006-02-07 17:11:02

Re: cum flying no where?

#22 2006-02-08 03:48:16

Re: cum flying no where?

#23 2006-02-08 21:02:33

Re: cum flying no where?

#24 2006-02-08 21:05:25

Re: cum flying no where?

#25 2006-02-09 07:47:48

Re: cum flying no where?

Board footer