Ms #447

JHWowk · 2006-01-14 04:15:13

In my most humblest opinion, I think that this young woman is by the far the most beautiful girl I have seen in a very long time, and her agony has renewed my faith not only in the unmistakable inner beauty of human nature, but in the wonderful universe itself - there's gotta be SOMETHING behind something that beautiful...I just wanted to vent my extreme awe at this submission.

John

takochan · 2006-01-14 21:21:08

JHWowk wrote:

In my most humblest opinion, I think that this young woman is by the far the most beautiful girl I have seen in a very long time, and her agony has renewed my faith not only in the unmistakable inner beauty of human nature, but in the wonderful universe itself - there's gotta be SOMETHING behind something that beautiful...I just wanted to vent my extreme awe at this submission.
John

John, I must thank you for having drawn my attention to Ms 477. I too find her and what she has shared with us quite awesomely lovely. It feels to me as if she has opened up some radiant and infinitely resonating space within herself and invited us into it.

At a more directly physical level, I'm pretty sure that from 03:20 I heard her having an ejaculation (the richly liquid sounds in the background seem to culminate in a series of quiet but distinct splashes, just as she also reaches a vocal peak). I do hope she will feel able to make an appearance on the forum; but whether she does or not, it is a truly wonderful agony that she has shared with us, and I'd like to thank her for that.

takochan

erdna · 2006-01-15 06:48:42

takochan, most of the agonees should be on this forum at least for a little while but it seems it's easier for them to send a submission on BA than sharing with us on this forum and I regret it. When you share you have to be ready to answer unexpected question. At least a lot of them are on confessions. But I still dream about having more girls on this forum.

EazinAlong · 2006-01-19 17:42:31

This is my first BA post, so please be gentle with me, though I'm no stranger to public controversy. {:-)

I love the agonies and want to thank all agonistas for their movies.

In viewing the very erotic Ms. 447, has anyone else considered that perhaps she's enjoying intercourse during her agony?

Having watched a handful of agonies, I realize that in some it's obvious the woman has wet fingers. Hot Ms. 347 and Ms. 443 are examples. I've seen at least one where it was my impression that a lucky helper had a tongue between her legs.

But watching the shoulder action of Ms. 447, it seems to me that she's being jostled more than she'd typically move herself and that neither shoulder is more active than the other, as would suggest masturbation. Is it intercourse?

Any thoughts on this?

And, if you haven't viewed it in a while, this is your good excuse to go back and watch her again. She's very hot.

PC elmo · 2006-01-23 00:50:26

EazinAlong wrote:

This is my first BA post, so please be gentle with me, though I'm no stranger to public controversy. {:-)

Welcome, EazinAlong! Dare I ask what public controversy you've met in the past?

In viewing the very erotic Ms. 447, has anyone else considered that perhaps she's enjoying intercourse during her agony?

Yes, that does seem likely. So far, I think only one of them is very obvious, but this brings my total to 10 women here for whom it is reasonably likely they engage in intercourse during their videos, as well as a few "strays" where I honestly can't tell what the heck is going on -- other than that the woman is enjoying it, of course.

erdna · 2006-01-23 05:05:06

EazinAlong and PC elmo, I reviewed Ms#447 agony and I disagree with you that she is having an intercourse. The shoulders motion is too slow for that. I would bet she is using a dildo and moves her hips in a f...ing motion instead like a lot of girls do when masturbating. Otherwise she is a very beautiful woman but I still prefer Ms#231 for the beauty.

pbrinton · 2006-01-23 05:58:33

If you listen carefully there seems to be a high pitched buzz that comes and goes with her movements. I suspect a vibrator.

Reminds me of the cartoon showing Sherlock Holmes standing holding something to his nose. The caption reads: "A vibrator, Watson, and recently used if I'm any judge!"

PC elmo · 2006-01-23 20:52:14

Upon further review ... (sorry, been watching too much football lately -- that's the North American verion ... anyone heard form No1steelerfan lately?)

I don't hear the buzz of a vibrator -- the background noise seems to me to be the whine of the camera. However, her shoulder movements do appear to be under her control. I don't think the speed is an issue, though, and she certainly seems to be responding to something.

What I noticed when listening again was that I could hear her fluids sloshing around. I also thought I heard someone else's breathing, in the 2:40-50 area, and during her orgasm, especially at 3:26 and 3:35. Of course, just because someone else was there doesn't mean it was an intercourse -- perhaps oral will turn out the be the best guess.

EazinAlong · 2006-01-24 00:00:38

PC elmo wrote:

EazinAlong wrote:
This is my first BA post, so please be gentle with me, though I'm no stranger to public controversy. {:-)
Welcome, EazinAlong! Dare I ask what public controversy you've met in the past?
In viewing the very erotic Ms. 447, has anyone else considered that perhaps she's enjoying intercourse during her agony?
Yes, that does seem likely. So far, I think only one of them is very obvious, but this brings my total to 10 women here for whom it is reasonably likely they engage in intercourse during their videos, as well as a few "strays" where I honestly can't tell what the heck is going on -- other than that the woman is enjoying it, of course.

I probably should have edited that quote down, but I'm going to have to learn a bit more about the syntax here first.

As a recovering journalist, former newspaper editor, occasional radio commentator and one-time candidate for public office who has many strongly held views, I've spent a lot of time in public advocacy roles. Not all have been universally popular. {:-)

For my political campaign, I ran as a Christian conservative opposing masturbation, internet erotica and interspecies marriage. NOT! Really, I'm a Bill Clinton/Tony Blair sort of progressive American and ran a campaign true to my values.

Unfortunately, my 30-year incumbent opponent is independently wealthy and buried me in an avalanche of money at the end. We got 40 percent of the vote and all of the major endorsements, so I felt good about it. But he's still the one called "senator". LOL.

Jo · 2006-01-24 02:32:04

EazinAlong wrote:

For my political campaign, I ran as a Christian conservative opposing masturbation, internet erotica and interspecies marriage. NOT! Really, I'm a Bill Clinton/Tony Blair sort of progressive American and ran a campaign true to my values.

Hopefully it is not one of those campaigns like that:

http://www.sexisforfags.com or the sister-site http://www.ironhymen.com

Sorry, but I find these pages horrible!

pbrinton · 2006-01-24 03:12:24

Jo wrote:

EazinAlong wrote:
For my political campaign, I ran as a Christian conservative opposing masturbation, internet erotica and interspecies marriage. NOT! Really, I'm a Bill Clinton/Tony Blair sort of progressive American and ran a campaign true to my values.
Hopefully it is not one of those campaigns like that:
http://www.sexisforfags.com or the sister-site http://www.ironhymen.com
Sorry, but I find these pages horrible!

Er... you do realize these pages are satire, right?

Jo · 2006-01-24 10:43:18

pbrinton wrote:

Jo wrote:
Sorry, but I find these pages horrible!
Er... you do realize these pages are satire, right?

Yep, it is satire, but it's so close to reality, that I am not sure if it's "only" satire any more...

PC elmo · 2006-01-26 22:25:10

That's some classic stuff right there. Hyperbole at it's best.

Jo wrote:

Yep, it is satire, but it's so close to reality, that I am not sure if it's "only" satire any more...

Usually, Jo, I think claims like that are also creative exaggeration (or simply out of touch with reality), but sadly,
there is often some evidence out and about which could be construed to support such otherwise paranoia. Just in the last few days, I heard of a story involving someone in the US government trying to force Google to release to them usage histories, so they could track people searching for pornography -- I don't even know which branch of government or whether pornography was even the real target. I'll post again once I get a hold of the whole story.

I also want to get some of my more conservative or religious friends to look at those sites and give me their reactions. It's all pretty funny until someone tries to make it real.

Jo · 2006-01-27 11:15:25

PC elmo wrote:

Usually, Jo, I think claims like that are also creative exaggeration...
...It's all pretty funny until someone tries to make it real.

Exactly that's the point I am thinking of. It could've been funny, if I did not know, that some super-conservative or religious "fanatic" (excuse that exaggeration!) people are really thinking like the site is done...

That's, why I find these pages horrible!

#1 2006-01-14 04:15:13

Ms #447

#2 2006-01-14 21:21:08

Re: Ms #447

#3 2006-01-15 06:48:42

Re: Ms #447

#4 2006-01-19 17:42:31

Re: Ms #447

#5 2006-01-23 00:50:26

Re: Ms #447

#6 2006-01-23 05:05:06

Re: Ms #447

#7 2006-01-23 05:58:33

Re: Ms #447

#8 2006-01-23 20:52:14

Re: Ms #447

#9 2006-01-24 00:00:38

Re: Ms #447

#10 2006-01-24 02:32:04

Re: Ms #447

#11 2006-01-24 03:12:24

Re: Ms #447

#12 2006-01-24 10:43:18

Re: Ms #447

#13 2006-01-26 22:25:10

Re: Ms #447

#14 2006-01-27 11:15:25

Re: Ms #447

Board footer