A Beautiful Agony Wish List for 2006

PC elmo · 2006-01-02 00:44:38

Continuing the theme from last year, Bish

In "Expectations,"

richard wrote:

...
We are discussing ideas for more interesting content on Overkill. We used to do vox popos but they didn't seem very popular. If you or anyone has any ideas - which don't involve nudity - we're all ears and lenses.

I think that means the confessions section covers the interview-style content for most of us.
Just for the record, I enjoyed seeing the off-the-street interviews also.
But far higher on the interest scale (no comparison, really) :
In "Full body agony,"

richard wrote:

erdna wrote:
guy
girl
Could you imagine these 2 happy faces on BA? And the girl below telling us what the guy on the top does to her?
Erdna, there's an Overkill coming up that you're going to like.

What a way to start off the new year!

At the top of my "wish list" is just about anything involving intercourse.
Perhaps it'd help to run two cameras simultaneously (only both for the same site this time )

spudrph · 2006-01-02 02:54:35

I just stumbled across this site and its the most unbelievable thing I have ever seen.

The only things I would want are more FBA (although that seems to be a closed issue, and thats ok if thats the way it is going to be.) and some way to contact an artist via email if they were willing. They are all beautiful people and I want to thank them all for sharing such a deep deep intimacy with the world.

takochan · 2006-01-02 05:08:40

I'd like one or two more lesbian duets like Agony #267

Pretty please, with organic strawberries on top :-)

takochan

PS Happy New Year to all

Bishop Of Bath & Wells · 2006-01-02 09:46:37

PC elmo wrote:

Continuing the theme from last year, Bish

Wow, you've got a good memory!

Bish

Patrick63 · 2006-01-02 13:56:13

Yes! I would also love to see an intercourse. You would only have to see her face and perhaps the back of his head occationly. A great experience!

Jakeview · 2006-01-02 18:39:49

Patrick63 wrote:

You would only have to see her face and perhaps the back of his head occationly.

Even better, what if the camera were set straight on and the woman sat atop the man? Then we could watch her bounce up and down. They'd have to be careful not to get too rambunctious and stay properly within frame but it'd be an interesting and sexy agony nonetheless.

Jakeview · 2006-01-02 18:43:05

takochan wrote:

I'd like one or two more lesbian duets like Agony #267

I'm with takochan on this one. More double female agonies would be lovely.

Garybob · 2006-01-02 20:07:29

Jakeview wrote:

Patrick63 wrote:
You would only have to see her face and perhaps the back of his head occationly.
Even better, what if the camera were set straight on and the woman sat atop the man? Then we could watch her bounce up and down. They'd have to be careful not to get too rambunctious and stay properly within frame but it'd be an interesting and sexy agony nonetheless.

Well, I for one would not like to see intercourse here. That kind of stuff you can get all over the place and if BA starts in with that, there would be nothing that sets the site apart from any other site out there.

What I WOULD like to see, either on this site or on the one coming up next month is masturbation with water, i.e. shower-head or tub faucet. Now that is rare and hard to find stuff. There are some of those on the net, but very very little. Also, pillow humping. I found a site called Chicasplace.com where she gets off by humping just about anything soft, i.e. rolled up sock, pillow, even her vibrator. Now this is even more rare than the water stuff.

Garybob · 2006-01-02 20:09:07

Oh, I might add that chica's clips are full body!!!

al · 2006-01-02 21:21:51

Garybob wrote:

... if BA starts in with that, there would be nothing that sets the site apart from any other site out there.

Presenting face shots of people having real orgasms is what sets BA apart from the rest. I don't see why an intercourse would endanger this asset.

erdna · 2006-01-02 22:31:22

I understand that my little "happy faces" are not giving the picture for some of you. I try again:

guy laying on his belly on the top of the girl (can be lighter if using his elbows)
girl laying on her belly on the bed with the guy (or another girl) on top of her.
and the camera in front of them. That way, you only see their 2 faces and shoulders if the camera is at the right distance. No nudity, no FBA, everyhing is alright.

PC elmo · 2006-01-02 23:21:04

erdna wrote:

I understand that my little "happy faces" are not giving the picture for some of you. I try again:
guy laying on his belly on the top of the girl (can be lighter if using his elbows)
girl laying on her belly on the bed with the guy (or another girl) on top of her.
and the camera in front of them. That way, you only see their 2 faces and shoulders if the camera is at the right distance. No nudity, no FBA, everyhing is alright.

I get it now. I guess I was thinking it would be easier to set the camera at the side, with the couple lying on their sides in the usual "spooning" position. Either one can easily reach between the woman's legs to help out, and a couple pillows would keep her head from blocking out his. Keeping the looking-forward angle, which seems more natural/comfortable than a looking-upward angle, combined with the couple lying flat on top of each other would mean leaning over the edge of the bed, with camera pointed upwards! That'd be cool, too.

I like the idea of the woman "riding" the man, too, but it could take a few tries to keep the balance of the face in the frame and the breasts out. The upright position would probably work best as a secondary camera angle (with a camera on each person), and on the man, so he can show more of his chest without involving any actual nudity. It's pretty unpredictable how couples will move suddenly when the moments arrive!

PC elmo · 2006-01-02 23:29:53

Bishop Of Bath & Wells wrote:

Wow, you've got a good memory!

Well, it was a great idea last year. I knew it was back there somewhere, and I found it on the 12th of the 13 pages! I probably could have "resurfaced" it a bunch of different ways -- looks like I chose a good one!

al wrote:

Presenting face shots of people having real orgasms is what sets BA apart from the rest. I don't see why an intercourse would endanger this asset.

My thoughts exactly!

Patrick63 · 2006-01-03 11:38:11

If the girl is on top of the man she could wear a t-shirt or a bra to be keep the nudity out. I am open for intercourse in any suitable position. But I see no need to brake the "no-nudity rule".

#1 2006-01-02 00:44:38

A Beautiful Agony Wish List for 2006

#2 2006-01-02 02:54:35

Re: A Beautiful Agony Wish List for 2006

#3 2006-01-02 05:08:40

Re: A Beautiful Agony Wish List for 2006

#4 2006-01-02 09:46:37

Re: A Beautiful Agony Wish List for 2006

#5 2006-01-02 13:56:13

Re: A Beautiful Agony Wish List for 2006

#6 2006-01-02 18:39:49

Re: A Beautiful Agony Wish List for 2006

#7 2006-01-02 18:43:05

Re: A Beautiful Agony Wish List for 2006

#8 2006-01-02 20:07:29

Re: A Beautiful Agony Wish List for 2006

#9 2006-01-02 20:09:07

Re: A Beautiful Agony Wish List for 2006

#10 2006-01-02 21:21:51

Re: A Beautiful Agony Wish List for 2006

#11 2006-01-02 22:31:22

Re: A Beautiful Agony Wish List for 2006

#12 2006-01-02 23:21:04

Re: A Beautiful Agony Wish List for 2006

#13 2006-01-02 23:29:53

Re: A Beautiful Agony Wish List for 2006

#14 2006-01-03 11:38:11

Re: A Beautiful Agony Wish List for 2006

Board footer