Full body agony

inspiro · 2005-12-13 20:02:42

More full body agony, more money.

Tellin · 2005-12-13 21:24:06

A person of few, and slightly confusing, words.

inspiro · 2005-12-13 21:51:30

Meaning I'll be a happy paying guy if BA allow full body videos...

al · 2005-12-13 22:52:44

Yeah, and there should be an S&M section too. There are endless possibilities. I'd also be willing to order pizza through the site.

Nowaysis · 2005-12-13 23:28:43

Just don't ask for the special 'secret agony sauce' on your pizza...

Garybob · 2005-12-14 04:33:20

C'mon, are you folks making the "slippery-slope" argument? This site is clearly not set-up for S&M or any other deviant stuff!

Nothin wrong with adding one more voice to the 99 who requested more FBA.

al · 2005-12-14 10:04:14

Garybob wrote:

Nothin wrong with adding one more voice to the 99 who requested more FBA.

Wrong? No.
Much, perhaps.

Let me add one more voice to those who think that the concept of the site is perfect the way it is, and supplies for a well-defined demand which has been starved for too long.

Requests for more FBAs are no surprise.
But why here? Especially after this issue has been pretty much overdiscussed.
This kind of "request" is seemingly for more of something. In reality it's like "Hey, I don't like the site the way it is. If you have some sense, you'll change it!"

zanzi · 2005-12-14 12:40:01

al wrote:

Let me add one more voice to those who think that the concept of the site is perfect the way it is, and supplies for a well-defined demand which has been starved for too long.

Fully agree. Anybody interested in FBAs should check out the Intimate Moments' section at abbywinters.com. I subscribe to both BA and AW and feel I am getting the best of two worlds.

Tellin · 2005-12-14 13:02:00

inspiro wrote:

Meaning I'll be a happy paying guy if BA allow full body videos...

You have already plunked down some money, and you can enjoy this wnderfully beautiful site for what it is. The FBA was a one time thing on this site, at least in my belief.

Welcome to the site, but if you're looking for any more than what is already here, I'm afraid you might be disappointed.

Enjoy the site, don't diss the agonists and don't ask for what you now know you won't get.

Last edited by Tellin (2005-12-14 13:04:22)

richard · 2005-12-14 13:51:11

There will be more FBA's, but they'll be on a new site. Some will contain nudity. Some of the existing Agonees have contributed.

salsasalsa · 2005-12-14 14:02:27

Garybob wrote:

C'mon, are you folks making the "slippery-slope" argument? This site is clearly not set-up for S&M or any other deviant stuff!

I think that was what is commonly known as irony

salsasalsa · 2005-12-14 14:07:39

al wrote:

Garybob wrote:
Nothin wrong with adding one more voice to the 99 who requested more FBA.
Wrong? No.
Much, perhaps.
Let me add one more voice to those who think that the concept of the site is perfect the way it is, and supplies for a well-defined demand which has been starved for too long.
Requests for more FBAs are no surprise.
But why here? Especially after this issue has been pretty much overdiscussed.
This kind of "request" is seemingly for more of something. In reality it's like "Hey, I don't like the site the way it is. If you have some sense, you'll change it!"

It's nothing of the sort. Customers, members, call them whatever you like, are entitled to voice their opinions. I trust you are not trying to muzzle dissenting views, right?

AW is irrelevant to this discussion. The FBA we've seen was not nudity. Asking to see the clothed body, even (shock horror [rolling eyes]) breast contours under a blouse or t-shirt, is not the same as demanding nudity.

al · 2005-12-14 14:26:37

salsasalsa wrote:

Garybob wrote:
C'mon, are you folks making the "slippery-slope" argument? This site is clearly not set-up for S&M or any other deviant stuff!
I think that was what is commonly known as irony

I think Garybob knew that. He just denied my analogy between FBAs and other stuff. (You left out his last sentence.)

salsasalsa wrote:

... Customers, members, call them whatever you like, are entitled to voice their opinions. I trust you are not trying to muzzle dissenting views, right?

Right. My intention was to voice my opinion and dissenting view for all to see.

salsasalsa wrote:

Asking to see the clothed body, even (shock horror [rolling eyes]) breast contours under a blouse or t-shirt, is not the same as demanding nudity.

Agreed.

al · 2005-12-14 14:39:19

To who sent me a message:
My answer bounced back from hotmail.

inspiro · 2005-12-14 20:37:41

richard wrote:

There will be more FBA's, but they'll be on a new site. Some will contain nudity. Some of the existing Agonees have contributed.

That's great news! When? Where? Don't take me wrong, this site has the most erotic videos I've ever seen! It's just that the full body agony in overkill section was even better...

Jo · 2005-12-14 21:54:37

al wrote:

Let me add one more voice to those who think that the concept of the site is perfect the way it is, and supplies for a well-defined demand which has been starved for too long.
Requests for more FBAs are no surprise.
But why here?

One more voice agreeing to you... and to the concept of THIS site...

richard wrote:

There will be more FBA's, but they'll be on a new site.

With this fact, the discussion should have been finished. The FBA-fans get what they like (on another site) and the purists here get this site kept pure.

OUF!

Bishop Of Bath & Wells · 2005-12-14 23:13:11

inspiro wrote:

That's great news! When? Where? Don't take me wrong, this site has the most erotic videos I've ever seen! It's just that the full body agony in overkill section was even better...

Richard confirmed on another thread that they hope to have this site up & running around February next year..........so not long to go!

Bish

Nowaysis · 2005-12-14 23:23:15

The cynical part of me can't help but notice that this is an excellent marketing method. Of course, we don't yet know anything about payment plans for the new site, but assuming it's completely stand alone from BA, it's almost an act of evil genius to first whet our apetites with an FBA here, and then have us pay for yet another full site to get more of it. Hoping that we will continue to pay for regular agony as well, of course.

This is of course completely disregarding the possibility that anyone in the age of the Internet actually has any integrity left, and will stand by their values and beliefs, in this case the firm belief that FBA does not beling here at BA.

al · 2005-12-15 05:45:20

Wow. A killer argument to create moral complication for the site admins.
I don't know what belongs here at BA and what doesn't. I only know that FBAs are not what I pay for. Standard agonies - as we all know, but are usually shy to point it out - neither guarantee the satisfaction of a given customer every time.
So if I am spared of redundant things I cannot but appreciate it.

Garybob · 2005-12-15 06:12:48

Complicated minds make the world a complicated place!!!!

I am encouraged at the idea/plans for a new site featuring FBAs. Richard, good call!

As to Nowaysis, very good argument whether rooted in cynisism or not. I for one will most likely forego one membership for the other.

And to those few of you who actually voiced dissent for FBAs on this site, your voices have just as much value as those who want more of it. All feedback has relevance as far as I am concerned. Good to see that people can disagree and still be adult about it.

Nowaysis · 2005-12-15 11:25:38

I will unfortunately probably have to choose as well. I'm a poor student, and can't really afford subscriptions to lots of different sites. I had to think long and hard about whether I could afford just BA, and this site is still in my opinion pretty cheap as internet "porn" sites go.

Garybob · 2005-12-15 19:54:14

"Porn" site??? Is that what this site is? I've often read posts that classify it as...."ART"!

richard · 2005-12-16 01:59:12

Nowaysis wrote:

The cynical part of me can't help but notice that this is an excellent marketing method. Of course, we don't yet know anything about payment plans for the new site, but assuming it's completely stand alone from BA, it's almost an act of evil genius to first whet our apetites with an FBA here, and then have us pay for yet another full site to get more of it. Hoping that we will continue to pay for regular agony as well, of course.
This is of course completely disregarding the possibility that anyone in the age of the Internet actually has any integrity left, and will stand by their values and beliefs, in this case the firm belief that FBA does not beling here at BA.

Ha! We're not that well organised or that fiendish. We're just making it up as we go along.

erdna · 2005-12-16 04:36:35

A majority of the members of this site mentioned that they would be in favor of a FBA section, in overkill for instance but could be in a entirely new section. There has been just one FBA so far (OV0086) and a lot of dicussions then followed. How can we explain to see BA so popular and in the same time seeing the majority of BA members (on the forum at least) wanting to see FBA? I am still waiting for the girls on this site (like our recent member #422) telling us what they think about a full body agony or FBA. I am speaking here about FBA with no nudity.

Nowaysis · 2005-12-16 10:29:54

Garybob wrote:

"Porn" site??? Is that what this site is? I've often read posts that classify it as...."ART"!

Hence the quotationmarks.

#1 2005-12-13 20:02:42

Full body agony

#2 2005-12-13 21:24:06

Re: Full body agony

#3 2005-12-13 21:51:30

Re: Full body agony

#4 2005-12-13 22:52:44

Re: Full body agony

#5 2005-12-13 23:28:43

Re: Full body agony

#6 2005-12-14 04:33:20

Re: Full body agony

#7 2005-12-14 10:04:14

Re: Full body agony

#8 2005-12-14 12:40:01

Re: Full body agony

#9 2005-12-14 13:02:00

Re: Full body agony

#10 2005-12-14 13:51:11

Re: Full body agony

#11 2005-12-14 14:02:27

Re: Full body agony

#12 2005-12-14 14:07:39

Re: Full body agony

#13 2005-12-14 14:26:37

Re: Full body agony

#14 2005-12-14 14:39:19

Re: Full body agony

#15 2005-12-14 20:37:41

Re: Full body agony

#16 2005-12-14 21:54:37

Re: Full body agony

#17 2005-12-14 23:13:11

Re: Full body agony

#18 2005-12-14 23:23:15

Re: Full body agony

#19 2005-12-15 05:45:20

Re: Full body agony

#20 2005-12-15 06:12:48

Re: Full body agony

#21 2005-12-15 11:25:38

Re: Full body agony

#22 2005-12-15 19:54:14

Re: Full body agony

#23 2005-12-16 01:59:12

Re: Full body agony

#24 2005-12-16 04:36:35

Re: Full body agony

#25 2005-12-16 10:29:54

Re: Full body agony

Board footer