You are not logged in.
Richard, I agree with you. It very rare to get a good hard core erotic movie. The professional ones are most of the time unreal (a lot of make up, glances to the camera...) and faked and amateur ones generally try to copy the professional ones who are already good for nothing. That's why I can say that so far Abby Winters is probably the best for videos. BA too is the best but cannot be compared to anyone since it's unique. Richard, I think since you have a unique approach (like choosing girls next door type) and being focussed on an actual passionate eroticism, you should be able to make good hard core erotic videos.
Offline
Richard, I agree with you. It very rare to get a good hard core erotic movie. The professional ones are most of the time unreal (a lot of make up, glances to the camera...) and faked and amateur ones generally try to copy the professional ones who are already good for nothing. That's why I can say that so far Abby Winters is probably the best for videos. BA too is the best but cannot be compared to anyone since it's unique. Richard, I think since you have a unique approach (like choosing girls next door type) and being focussed on an actual passionate eroticism, you should be able to make good hard core erotic videos.
For an industry as huge as pornography, with such an enormous customer base and so many companies manufacturing the stuff, isn't it staggering just how poor the product is? We have some pretty good equipment now, maybe we should give it a try.
Offline
Yeah, you should define for us the new meaning of the "concluding facial".
Offline
For an industry as huge as pornography, with such an enormous customer base and so many companies manufacturing the stuff, isn't it staggering just how poor the product is? We have some pretty good equipment now, maybe we should give it a try.
I must have been a member of literally dozens of different adult sites over past 7-8 years, most of which varied between rubbish to the plain awful. In all that time I don't recall a single occasion where I was asked to complete a questionnaire or anything similar. How can such a huge industry have such a poor understanding of its own market?
BTW in my humble opinion Femaleorgasmworld and Yanks.com are not even fit to be mentioned in the same breath as BA or AW. Save your money.
Bish
"Today is the beginning of whatever comes next. Stop running, confront, and conquer!"
Offline
Speaking of AW...Lottie and Dee. Together.
That is all.
Offline
And they're all wearing lingerie and lots of makeup, which we know from porn to be essential accoutrmements for fulfilling sex.
BTW in my humble opinion Femaleorgasmworld and Yanks.com are not even fit to be mentioned in the same breath as BA or AW. Save your money.
Bish
Thanks, Richard and Bish, for passing on the wisdom of your experience!
Yes, a short list is best. I am determined to join AW and ISM at some point (and then whatever else Richard and company have in the works), but I don't think there's much beyond that for which I'm willing to pay. It was a big step for me just to pay for ANY website at all when I joined this one.
There is, however, another angle that may deserve a mention here, even though it doesn't really have anything to do with female masturbation. For those who are really into still pictures with female nudes as the subject, there are many gallery sites, such as DOMAI, which feature the work of a particular photographer. Since they don't depict sexual acts, these strike me as pretty harmless. (That said, the big draw for ISM is that the subjects photograph themselves).
"There is always room for something more."
Offline
At the risk of touching off a debate on the relative morality of "hidden" or "voyeur" videos, I'll mention Hidden Jane (www.hiddenjane.com). It's primarily a masturbation site, some hidden, some not. Some of the content is fantastic, although the voyeur material is generally low-quality video, of course. The "Masturbation Tape" series, in particular, is non-hidden content of women taping themselves.
By the way, I first learned about BA (Hooray!) in a post in the "Jane's Diary" section. I even found the link in their archives: http://hiddenjane.com/diary/071104/index.shtml. (No password required for that portion.) Fair's fair in mentioning them back, right?
-Ad
Offline
Ok I'm glad the whole voyuer thing was brought up actually. I was looking at a website called www.voyeurrealm.com and I noticed there was lots of masturbation clips. I would like to join this site but I have a few concerns. My first concern : is everyone on the site 18 years and older? They have a u.s.c. 2257 compliance statment, but if these are "voyeur" vids then how do they have documentation of the videos? My next concern is I live in Canada and is viewing "voyeur" vids against the law? I don't want to end up in trouble just for accessing a site. The reason I like sites like these is not for the voyeur aspect but for the masturbation as it is usually more realistic and it seems more intense then other sites. I wish while surfing the web for porn we didn't have to worry about things like these but until things are safer thats how it's going to be. Oh, by the way I have been to all of the sites mentioned in previous posts at one time or another.
Offline
I must have been a member of literally dozens of different adult sites over past 7-8 years, most of which varied between rubbish to the plain awful. In all that time I don't recall a single occasion where I was asked to complete a questionnaire or anything similar. How can such a huge industry have such a poor understanding of its own market?
BTW in my humble opinion Femaleorgasmworld and Yanks.com are not even fit to be mentioned in the same breath as BA or AW. Save your money.
Bish
Bishop, what a marvelous idea!!! I love it. A questionnaire is a great way to get some feedback on the site and it's content. Many of the sites I have been a member on have a feedback scoring system that allows you to rate a single post, like Homeclips and Tomvoyeur but no way to give general feedback regarding any aspects of the site itself.
My guess is that most site owners/administrators don't really want to hear that kind of feedback. With so many paying customers and so much money coming in from subscriptions, who cares what the customers think.....as long as they pay. It's the old, "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" attitude!
Just so you know, Onionbooty.com is the worst site out there for this kind of thing. Updates are about 1 per month, sometimes 2 if you're lucky. And the Administrator always has some lame excuse or apology for being slow with the updates. The girls are absolutely to die for, particularly if you're a butt fan like myself. But the price at $24.95 per month makes it not worth the investment. To boot, any complaints to the administrator about the slow updates are always met with vile, bile-spilling profanity and a complete lack of professionalism. Stay away from this site.
Back on topic however, your idea is great and I will even suggest it to a few of the sites where I have a membership.
Offline
.............this looks promising, although it's a very young site and as such has little content so far.
Bish
"Today is the beginning of whatever comes next. Stop running, confront, and conquer!"
Offline
There is a german blog site I visit once in a while. They have pictures and videos and there are a few showing orgasmic women and men. They are a Dutch language site but there are links for english translations.
And every Friday is what the site owner calls "Kodie's Hardcore Friday."
And it's free but downloads can be a pain sometimes.
Last edited by Tellin (2005-12-08 23:16:29)
Offline