no. 10 has a great mouth!!

wilson · 2005-10-02 14:01:12

Hi

All this talk and investigation re Lauren prompted me to take a new look at no. 10.

Doesnt she have just the perfect mouth?

Her mouth makes a lovely face a beautiful one.

Lauren, if this is you then.. own up!

Anyway - isnt it time you submitted a new agony...hey, how about an overkill?

joy194 · 2005-10-03 12:10:22

Lauren, why did you exchange #0010? Where did you put the "old #0010"? Did anybody notice the change?

pinguin · 2005-10-03 14:40:58

joy194 wrote:

Did anybody notice the change?

Yep, you're right. They're no longer the same lady. She probably got second thoughts.

asm2agny · 2005-10-03 14:54:44

That very much is not the original #10!

Richard, Lauren: Why did you change this?

If the original agonette wanted to withdraw her agony, well, no problem -- but why not just mark it as such?

As a paying customer I feel like such substitutions puts content on your site that I don't even know about. Do we really have to go back and look at every face every day, and hope we notice a change? I'd hate to think that's the way this site works.

In general you two do a great job and I love your site; please consider not making such substitutions in the future, or at least telling us about them.

richard · 2005-10-03 15:05:58

asm2agny wrote:

That very much is not the original #10!
Richard, Lauren: Why did you change this?
If the original agonette wanted to withdraw her agony, well, no problem -- but why not just mark it as such?
As a paying customer I feel like such substitutions puts content on your site that I don't even know about. Do we really have to go back and look at every face every day, and hope we notice a change? I'd hate to think that's the way this site works.
In general you two do a great job and I love your site; please consider not making such substitutions in the future, or at least telling us about them.

That was a long long time ago. We expect not to be making further substitutions.

pinguin · 2005-10-03 15:33:06

richard wrote:

That was a long long time ago.

Hmm, let's check the file date in the zipped archive. What? 29-08-2005 12:20? If that's the last time you had a bath, than sure it's a long time ago. In most other cases I would qualify this as "recently".

As asm2agny said, if the agonette wants to withdraw, no problem. But please don't try this politician speak on us. Thanks.

wilson · 2005-10-03 20:29:46

Hey

I made this point in a dif post about the site appearing to be refreshed. There were a few agonies that I did not recognise.

I think this is cool though. More newbies to look at.

And Lauren....did u replace the old one with one of you???

Looks great.

You are truly awesome!

johnp54 · 2005-10-04 00:21:17

Yeah! The original #0010 that I have on file is definitely different from this #0010. Hoever, now I have both. By the way, anyone else notice others that were changed?

Last edited by johnp54 (2005-10-04 00:22:16)

shannon · 2005-10-04 01:02:24

pinguin wrote:

richard wrote:
That was a long long time ago.
Hmm, let's check the file date in the zipped archive. What? 29-08-2005 12:20? If that's the last time you had a bath, than sure it's a long time ago. In most other cases I would qualify this as "recently".
As asm2agny said, if the agonette wants to withdraw, no problem. But please don't try this politician speak on us. Thanks.

I have no idea when this file was changed, but don't go equating the file date with when the content was altered. There are a million reasons why a file might be re-uploaded. well a couple.. lauren is currently in the process of revamping old vids for the new site for example.

pinguin · 2005-10-04 06:59:02

shannon wrote:

I have no idea when this file was changed, but don't go equating the file date with when the content was altered.

If the file date IN the zip file is 29/08, you can safely assume the file was not altered nor uploaded before that date.

richard · 2005-10-04 11:35:13

pinguin wrote:

shannon wrote:
I have no idea when this file was changed, but don't go equating the file date with when the content was altered.
If the file date IN the zip file is 29/08, you can safely assume the file was not altered nor uploaded before that date.

Yes but it doesn't mean the file zipped on the 29/08 is any different from an earlier dated version. You'll find quite a few files like this as we move data around the servers.

I could be wrong but I'm pretty sure that video was changed many months ago.

asm2agny · 2005-10-04 14:27:12

OK, well, could you please tell us if there have been any other replacemnts?

I already know about, um #68 (I think that's the number).

Jo · 2005-10-04 17:52:59

asm2agny wrote:

OK, well, could you please tell us if there have been any other replacemnts?
I already know about, um #68 (I think that's the number).

Sorry, I have to dissapoint you, but all the vids (or better: pics) around #0068 haven´t been changed since minimum one year... (I saved them on my drive in september 2004 and I find no change. (except #0010 of course))

#1 2005-10-02 14:01:12

no. 10 has a great mouth!!

#2 2005-10-03 12:10:22

Re: no. 10 has a great mouth!!

#3 2005-10-03 14:40:58

Re: no. 10 has a great mouth!!

#4 2005-10-03 14:54:44

Re: no. 10 has a great mouth!!

#5 2005-10-03 15:05:58

Re: no. 10 has a great mouth!!

#6 2005-10-03 15:33:06

Re: no. 10 has a great mouth!!

#7 2005-10-03 20:29:46

Re: no. 10 has a great mouth!!

#8 2005-10-04 00:21:17

Re: no. 10 has a great mouth!!

#9 2005-10-04 01:02:24

Re: no. 10 has a great mouth!!

#10 2005-10-04 06:59:02

Re: no. 10 has a great mouth!!

#11 2005-10-04 11:35:13

Re: no. 10 has a great mouth!!

#12 2005-10-04 14:27:12

Re: no. 10 has a great mouth!!

#13 2005-10-04 17:52:59

Re: no. 10 has a great mouth!!

Board footer