353 and now 354!!!

alaclark · 2005-09-05 08:38:16

Two real sweeties in succession, 353 and now, wow!, 354. Deep appreciation to all concerned, though there's a bit of editing early on in 354 which may make the scene hasten unnecessarily.
But 354's afterglow is one of the loveliest and most extended I can recall. Just in case there's any doubt, Lauren and Richard -- and all those bashful contributors who dash off-screen the moment after they've climaxed -- THERE's the sort of time some of us would always hope to see you stay around. Especially if, after all that stern self-'punishment' you've treated yourself to, you can produce such a meltingly reassuring smile!

pinguin · 2005-09-05 13:32:45

alaclark wrote:

Two real sweeties in succession, 353 and now, wow!, 354

I think you're being unfair to 352. These were three very cute ladies in a row!

mcman58 · 2005-09-05 14:03:19

353 and 354 are exceptionally erotic. 352 as also very cute as pinquin says. All three are wonderful. So beautiful to watch them climax.

lasatramp · 2005-09-06 04:10:43

353 & 354 (not to take anything away from 352 or any other lovely contributors) were beautiful in their contributions! I must agree with alaclark's assesment of the "afterglow" shown by 354. She showed us that in her dreamy reflection of what just happened, she truly enjoyed being a woman able to "self pleasure" herself so magnificently! Come back soon...........!

alaclark · 2005-09-06 06:10:19

lasatramp wrote:

353 & 354 (not to take anything away from 352 or any other lovely contributors) were beautiful in their contributions! I must agree with alaclark's assesment of the "afterglow" shown by 354. She showed us that in her dreamy reflection of what just happened, she truly enjoyed being a woman able to "self pleasure" herself so magnificently! Come back soon...........!

Well put, lasatramp: you must be a kindred spirit! ala

uri · 2005-09-06 07:59:05

It's showtime! I am sorry, for my taste 0353 is too overact theatralical. That means, she IS not herself she ACT herself.

kroz · 2005-09-06 15:52:05

And how do you know that, uri?

I can't know for sure if it's an act, but I like her nevertheless.

al · 2005-09-06 16:38:28

uri wrote:

It's showtime! I am sorry, for my taste 0353 is too overact theatralical. That means, she IS not herself she ACT herself.

Hmm... well... I can also *feel* what you are talking about. As the matter of fact, vocalisation itself always makes me feel uneasy (the only exception so far is 293). But I can also say that I like her never the less, because there are moments of truth here and there which save the day for me. I definitely think that it could be worse. So I'd rather celebrate this one.

erdna · 2005-09-07 03:21:04

352 is OK but 353 and 354 are quite exceptional. However 355 is not.

austin · 2005-09-07 07:34:44

These critiques are what I hate. These women share something personal of themselves and you guys want to sit there and comment on whether it was truthful. Enjoy the ones your like and be silent about the ones you don't. If you keep up the critical comments like this, no women will want to share.

lauren · 2005-09-07 07:38:57

well said austin, thankyou. xo

uri · 2005-09-07 07:46:56

kroz wrote:

And how do you know that, uri?

Of course i don't know for sure. A perception is always a subjective personally feeling. I like (no, i love!!!) an Agony when she is genuine. She don't have to be good-looking only; in the first place she should be straightways true in expression of her feelings.

alaclark · 2005-09-07 19:12:35

austin wrote:

These critiques are what I hate. These women share something personal of themselves and you guys want to sit there and comment on whether it was truthful. Enjoy the ones your like and be silent about the ones you don't. If you keep up the critical comments like this, no women will want to share.

Like Lauren, I agree. It's nice, and can be interesting to others, to be able to express one's positive appreciations, and particular wonderings (pretty unsystematically in my case) so I hope we'll be allowed to go on with that kind of thing. But, heck, no public condemnations, nor even dismissals or brush-offs, whatsoever!

As Austin implies, it's no light matter for any woman (or man) to offer her/himself to our gaze in this way. The greater the variety who aren't discouraged from the particular personal adventure BA represents, the richer the overall result for all of us.

Them's my sentiments.

suresh · 2005-09-07 21:45:54

I've watched 353 just about ten times over the last 24 hours. I think Ms Catgirl's Agony # 353 is THE most erotic and complete orgasm on BA so far....

Catgirl is beautiful...she's young, she's gentle, she's cute, she' sweet...
She smiles, she whimpers, she moans...she weeps, she sobs!!
she breathes crazy, she goes cross-eyed,
she thrashes around, she screams.....

she simply DIES...through a breathtaking orgasm...followed by strong 'aftershocks'....not just a faint 'afterglow'..

Its just that: nothing more...nothing less...

Cant wait for her uncut, OVERKILL. That I suppose would convince the sceptics there's nothing artificial about her agony...she's just a warm, uninhibited girl, who just LOVES going thru agonies..and she's skilled....she knows precisely how to attain her agony...

Ell · 2005-09-07 22:21:25

You're besotted suresh, aren't you? Some of the agonies are indeed mesmerising.

erdna · 2005-09-08 03:45:35

I agree with you Suresh, I watched again #353 and this girl is a natural one despite she is very vocal. Sincere and sexy. And the best, she is certainly not showing off. Cat lovers are like that I guess, they cannot cheat. You don't cheat a cat, never. Anyway, that shows us the multiple facets of human sexuality.
Quiet or noisy, eyes closed or open, what counts the most is the intensity and you read that on the face and other little signs.I wonder if agonees have their toes spread out or feet turned in or out or pointed out. Too bad we cannot see that.
Suresh and Ell, did you find out like I did that after the orgasm reached, most of the agonees react the same way. They look sated, they smile, swallow their saliva, scratch their face or nose and best of all, they radiate happiness...no wonder! I certainly don't blame them!

erdna · 2005-09-08 04:06:44

Austin and Lauren, don't fall in the trap where "everybody is good, everybody is beautiful". I can understand Lauren who is a moderator and I guess has to be moderate and supportive for all agonees. But you have to leave a place for honest criticism. And this forum is the place for it. All agonees are fantastic since they dared to do it and shared with us intimate moments but some are more convincing while other are less. Read again my post. In other words I said #355 is not exceptional. I believe like the majority of the people I am not exceptional either. Is it better said that way?

lauren · 2005-09-08 04:25:06

I beleive that what we are wishing to encourage in the forums is constructive criticism. Everyone is entitled to an individual opinion, however when passing judgement, all members should be mindful of the agonees thoughts with regard to their submissions. Agony participants also read the forums. I don't want to sensor anyones opinions, therefore if they are kept in a constructive and positive manner it would be appreciated greatly. Lauren xo

austin · 2005-09-08 05:33:41

I never once said all submissions are great. What I believe is we should be thankful for all submissions and not belittle any of them. I only make comments about the ones I like. I remain silent about the ones that don't do it for me.

pinguin · 2005-09-08 06:56:37

erdna wrote:

don't fall in the trap where "everybody is good, everybody is beautiful"

I agree to some extent. If I question the sincerety of an agonee, I think I'm entitled to express my doubts. However, bluntly stating you don't like a certain agonee, like Erdna just did, is plain rude. BA is not a pageant contest. If you like her, say so, if you don't just keep that to yourself. No point in hurting someone's feelings.

al · 2005-09-08 16:20:36

lauren wrote:

I beleive that what we are wishing to encourage in the forums is constructive criticism.

austin wrote:

I only make comments about the ones I like. I remain silent about the ones that don't do it for me.

I only have criticism towards the ones I like. Only with them can I feel that I have been "robbed".

Of course, agonees have the right to disclose only as much of their most vulnerable moments as they please.
I just have an idiotic hope that maybe they aren't entirely aware of their occasionally erratic openness. And perhaps have an ambition to rectify it...

gmontie · 2005-09-09 11:53:53

I really like 0081, 288, 355, and 353. They are all GREAT! My hat is off to them for sharing! It's great....

erdna · 2005-09-09 16:16:15

I just saw #357 video. Do you think she is a STAR? Thanks #357 for submitting a performance. The fact she lets us see herself getting undressed and throwing away her bra is something new and interesting. On the other hand, do you think it's maybe too much? Or not enough? The idea there is the same than for a strip tease, isn't it?

lasatramp · 2005-09-09 20:55:54

357 IS a STAR! .....the beautiful, desparate, reaching & reaching for "it" and the mellow, dreaming, satisfaction and reflections on the "joys of being a woman"......!

alaclark · 2005-09-10 07:53:30

al wrote:

uri wrote:
It's showtime! I am sorry, for my taste 0353 is too overact theatralical. That means, she IS not herself she ACT herself.
Hmm... well... I can also *feel* what you are talking about. As the matter of fact, vocalisation itself always makes me feel uneasy (the only exception so far is 293). But I can also say that I like her never the less, because there are moments of truth here and there which save the day for me. I definitely think that it could be worse. So I'd rather celebrate this one.

Fascinating how this site keeps showing fresh ways in which humans can make things difficult for themselves by erecting artificial hurdles! Even before we came to BA, surely most of us knew that vocalization during intercourse (and so, at a guess, sometimes during masturbation) is a widespread and common -- common, not universal -- human phenomenon? For either sex. So, why on earth should vocalisation on these clips, in itself, 'always' make anyone uneasy? The valid questions -- which we've established, I hope, should never be complaints --about how self-conscious, or 'acting', particular Agonees may be, are a quite distinct matter.

#1 2005-09-05 08:38:16

353 and now 354!!!

#2 2005-09-05 13:32:45

Re: 353 and now 354!!!

#3 2005-09-05 14:03:19

Re: 353 and now 354!!!

#4 2005-09-06 04:10:43

Re: 353 and now 354!!!

#5 2005-09-06 06:10:19

Re: 353 and now 354!!!

#6 2005-09-06 07:59:05

Re: 353 and now 354!!!

#7 2005-09-06 15:52:05

Re: 353 and now 354!!!

#8 2005-09-06 16:38:28

Re: 353 and now 354!!!

#9 2005-09-07 03:21:04

Re: 353 and now 354!!!

#10 2005-09-07 07:34:44

Re: 353 and now 354!!!

#11 2005-09-07 07:38:57

Re: 353 and now 354!!!

#12 2005-09-07 07:46:56

Re: 353 and now 354!!!

#13 2005-09-07 19:12:35

Re: 353 and now 354!!!

#14 2005-09-07 21:45:54

Re: 353 and now 354!!!

#15 2005-09-07 22:21:25

Re: 353 and now 354!!!

#16 2005-09-08 03:45:35

Re: 353 and now 354!!!

#17 2005-09-08 04:06:44

Re: 353 and now 354!!!

#18 2005-09-08 04:25:06

Re: 353 and now 354!!!

#19 2005-09-08 05:33:41

Re: 353 and now 354!!!

#20 2005-09-08 06:56:37

Re: 353 and now 354!!!

#21 2005-09-08 16:20:36

Re: 353 and now 354!!!

#22 2005-09-09 11:53:53

Re: 353 and now 354!!!

#23 2005-09-09 16:16:15

Re: 353 and now 354!!!

#24 2005-09-09 20:55:54

Re: 353 and now 354!!!

#25 2005-09-10 07:53:30

Re: 353 and now 354!!!

Board footer