Suggestion box

MindIsAbsent · 2005-08-09 20:41:24

Suggestion: similar to an item made by Suresh.

Under each picture make one of the clickable things be, say, a *, at
least for any picture for which it is relevant.

That would lead to any information which is available about that person.
For example,
a) other numbers that they appear under
b) any "overkills" associated with them
c) anything else you choose to add to the site about the
person.

This suggestion is not a request for more information, just for
making it easier for people. Yes, exploration and discovery is
fun. But brousing through all the forums and overkill histories
is not the main fun that this site has to offer.

jedi232 · 2005-08-10 00:14:26

so do we win? i am hoping we get the new full body w/ clothes on vid for a overkill this week

richard · 2005-08-10 00:28:02

MindIsAbsent wrote:

Suggestion: similar to an item made by Suresh.
Under each picture make one of the clickable things be, say, a *, at
least for any picture for which it is relevant.
That would lead to any information which is available about that person.
For example,
a) other numbers that they appear under
b) any "overkills" associated with them
c) anything else you choose to add to the site about the
person.
This suggestion is not a request for more information, just for
making it easier for people. Yes, exploration and discovery is
fun. But brousing through all the forums and overkill histories
is not the main fun that this site has to offer.

Thanks for the suggestion - the new version of the site will have this covered.

splat · 2005-08-16 19:48:03

richard wrote:

We have had a video submitted in which we see the full body (clothes on). Let's hear the arguments for and against putting it up on Overkill as a one-off.

What a turn-on. Please put it up.

Keeps with your non-nude rule.

Is the actuall method still a mystery?

salsasalsa · 2005-08-16 23:04:26

splat wrote:

richard wrote:
We have had a video submitted in which we see the full body (clothes on). Let's hear the arguments for and against putting it up on Overkill as a one-off.
What a turn-on. Please put it up.
Keeps with your non-nude rule.
Is the actuall method still a mystery?

Seconded. Yes, please.

Arguments for:
a. Adds variety to the site
b. The shape of the body would be interesting, even clothed.

richard · 2005-08-17 01:12:24

splat wrote:

Is the actuall method still a mystery?

Oh no, it's very obvious.

Kermit78 · 2005-08-17 03:06:00

Let's be serious, now. Richard, you can't really tease us like that and then NOT put it up as an Overkill !

I'll put my bet in with the "Yea" camp.

jedi232 · 2005-08-17 05:49:16

tonight should be a new overkill right?
we'll keep our fingers crossed for the elusive vid he's speaking of

lauren · 2005-08-17 06:07:21

sorry peeps not tonight, you'll all just have to keep your fingers crossed a little longer xo

pablo · 2005-08-17 09:21:49

My fingers are so crossed I think I've inadvertantly broken them.

Happy now?

lauren · 2005-08-17 23:43:52

ha ha....

Iso · 2005-08-19 08:12:01

richard wrote:

We have had a video submitted in which we see the full body (clothes on). Let's hear the arguments for and against putting it up on Overkill as a one-off.

We saw quite a bit more than just face in #200. I don't understand the concern...

voyeur · 2005-08-24 18:36:15

I don't know if this has been suggested already, but I would like to have a quick way to find a particular agony. Right now I have to guess what page it might be on, and then fish around for it, and to make matters worse, the page numbers change as new submissions are added. Maybe a list of pages with the number range (Page 4: 0100-0124, for instance) would work.

monkey13 · 2005-09-03 10:31:40

richard wrote:

We have had a video submitted in which we see the full body (clothes on). Let's hear the arguments for and against putting it up on Overkill as a one-off.

Richard:

I cannot locate where you wrote this, but I think it's a great idea to putting the full body clip up on Overkill.

Personally, it's not so much nudity as such as other parts of the agonee's body that I want to see. If the naked body is "ugly" (eg. pierced, tatooed, frizled cunt, etc), nudity turns me off. Rather than "ugly" nudity, I would like to see a "properly" clothed pretty and clean girl masturbating and cumming hard.

johnp54 · 2005-09-03 19:32:16

monkey13 wrote:

richard wrote:
We have had a video submitted in which we see the full body (clothes on). Let's hear the arguments for and against putting it up on Overkill as a one-off.
I would like to see a "properly" clothed pretty and clean girl masturbating and cumming hard.

I could not agree more

By the way Richard, what is the status on this subject?

richard · 2005-09-04 01:10:51

johnp54 wrote:

monkey13 wrote:
richard wrote:
We have had a video submitted in which we see the full body (clothes on). Let's hear the arguments for and against putting it up on Overkill as a one-off.
I would like to see a "properly" clothed pretty and clean girl masturbating and cumming hard.
I could not agree more
By the way Richard, what is the status on this subject?

It's up to Lauren. She chooses what goes where and when.

Ell · 2005-09-04 01:31:31

monkey13 wrote:

We have had a video submitted in which we see the full body (clothes on). Let's hear the arguments for and against putting it up on Overkill as a one-off.
Richard:
I cannot locate where you wrote this, but I think it's a great idea to putting the full body clip up on Overkill.
Personally, it's not so much nudity as such as other parts of the agonee's body that I want to see. If the naked body is "ugly" (eg. pierced, tatooed, frizled cunt, etc), nudity turns me off. Rather than "ugly" nudity, I would like to see a "properly" clothed pretty and clean girl masturbating and cumming hard.

monkey. I just have to ask, and I will possibly regret doing so, but what exactly is a frizled cunt?

austin · 2005-09-04 01:34:41

I'd be up for it as an experiment. I've found that those submissions where the woman's breast is almost showing causes my eye to focus on hoping for a peek rather than on her face and sounds. But if she is fully clothed, maybe that won't be an issue. I like only having the face to look at because it forces me to focus on the face and sounds. But I'd be interested in seeing a fully clothed submission.

erdna · 2005-09-04 03:41:30

Fully clothed with a hidden vibrator? Or a hand in the pants?

johnp54 · 2005-09-04 04:46:22

OK

So what's the status Lauren?

Jo · 2005-09-04 09:52:25

austin wrote:

I've found that those submissions where the woman's breast is almost showing causes my eye to focus on hoping for a peek rather than on her face and sounds.

Ah, finally somebody speaking out, what I thought for a long time! I think, that the need to concentrate on the face and to have your imagination play adds much to the experience... The more you SEE, the less you get!

Deeper · 2005-09-04 17:05:38

Jo wrote:

austin wrote:
I've found that those submissions where the woman's breast is almost showing causes my eye to focus on hoping for a peek rather than on her face and sounds.
Ah, finally somebody speaking out, what I thought for a long time! I think, that the need to concentrate on the face and to have your imagination play adds much to the experience... The more you SEE, the less you get!

It's a guy thing. We always wonder if the thing we aren't seeing is something we're missing. Probably one of the reasons men are so fascinated by the female orgasm is that so much of it is internalised. All we have to go on is facial expression and vocalisations and so we end up inventing the so-called "dead-giveaways" like body spasms, hyper-secretion or "post-orgasmic nipple". Something like a mental tick-box which says, "ok we've had 4 out of 5 telltales, so I'm willing to believe it was real"

At the risk of gross generalisation, I'd say that most women view these clips on the undestanding that the orgasm is real and thus empathise with the *emotion* of the sharing, rather than getting off on the mere *fact* of the event.

Either we accept the reality of the orgasm and examine the faces for nuances or we demand more evidence of it's reality in the first place. Hence the "I wanna see more" demands - almost exclusively from men, I note.

Me? I'm in showbiz so I accept the maxim: "Leave them wanting more".

That was a little off-topic, so my suggestion is a combination of a number of forum threads elsewhere rolled into one: A sidebar in which movie/tv clips of agonies are available. This would encompass the requests for "celebs", "favourite movie moments", "was that real or not?" and "doesn't she look like that actress in...?" as well as a comparison of submitted actualité versus published simulation.

monkey13 · 2005-09-05 04:52:58

Ell wtote;

monkey. I just have to ask, and I will possibly regret doing so, but what exactly is a frizled cunt?

It's not "frizled," but it's "frizzled." I misspelt it. Imagine the color and the shape of frizzled bacon.

monkey13 · 2005-09-05 05:08:02

Deeper wote:

Me? I'm in showbiz so I accept the maxim: "Leave them wanting more".

In a way, this will be realized by a clothed body. Clothes enhance eroticism and/or obscenity. But it has to be done with taste. E.g., Catherine d'Neuve in Belle de jour.

Ell · 2005-09-05 07:18:31

monkey13 wrote:

Ell wtote;
monkey. I just have to ask, and I will possibly regret doing so, but what exactly is a frizled cunt?
It's not "frizled," but it's "frizzled." I misspelt it. Imagine the color and the shape of frizzled bacon.

Thanks for the description - it'll make my next BLT a whole new experience.

#76 2005-08-09 20:41:24

Re: Suggestion box

#77 2005-08-10 00:14:26

Re: Suggestion box

#78 2005-08-10 00:28:02

Re: Suggestion box

#79 2005-08-16 19:48:03

Re: Suggestion box

#80 2005-08-16 23:04:26

Re: Suggestion box

#81 2005-08-17 01:12:24

Re: Suggestion box

#82 2005-08-17 03:06:00

Re: Suggestion box

#83 2005-08-17 05:49:16

Re: Suggestion box

#84 2005-08-17 06:07:21

Re: Suggestion box

#85 2005-08-17 09:21:49

Re: Suggestion box

#86 2005-08-17 23:43:52

Re: Suggestion box

#87 2005-08-19 08:12:01

Re: Suggestion box

#88 2005-08-24 18:36:15

Re: Suggestion box

#89 2005-09-03 10:31:40

Re: Suggestion box

#90 2005-09-03 19:32:16

Re: Suggestion box

#91 2005-09-04 01:10:51

Re: Suggestion box

#92 2005-09-04 01:31:31

Re: Suggestion box

#93 2005-09-04 01:34:41

Re: Suggestion box

#94 2005-09-04 03:41:30

Re: Suggestion box

#95 2005-09-04 04:46:22

Re: Suggestion box

#96 2005-09-04 09:52:25

Re: Suggestion box

#97 2005-09-04 17:05:38

Re: Suggestion box

#98 2005-09-05 04:52:58

Re: Suggestion box

#99 2005-09-05 05:08:02

Re: Suggestion box

#100 2005-09-05 07:18:31

Re: Suggestion box

Board footer