Agony 0288

joy194 · 2005-08-03 17:03:15

Can anybody tell me, if 0288 can be found on different sites? I have the same question on 0194.

erdna · 2005-08-04 04:04:11

Hi Joy194, I can see you took the same ID number than one of your favorite agony.
About your question: #288 is not now on abbywinters site. For #194 there is some resemblance to one of abbywinters girls but I am not sure. I have to check that up.

ilana · 2005-08-04 07:24:49

Hey Joy, I know that 288 is on ishotmyself.com under the nickname 'cat', I can't seem to spot 194 anywhere though, but she's a cutie so I'll keep looking!

pinguin · 2005-08-04 11:37:52

ilana wrote:

Hey Joy, I know that 288 is on ishotmyself.com under the nickname 'cat

Are you sure? I can't find anyone on ISM by that nickname.

ilana · 2005-08-05 05:31:01

Just figured out why, Cat's a friend of a friend who told me about her BA and ISM, but she probably isn't up on the ISM site yet. Gives us something to look forward to though...

joy194 · 2005-08-05 13:57:20

O.K. after surfing oround a little bit, I think I've found her. Try ftv-girls.com (her name: Alexa) or the site alexamodel.com. It looks like that she is #0288. What do you think? A real beauty. Check out the sites! Have fun!

Bishop Of Bath & Wells · 2005-08-05 17:28:52

Alexa is a real beauty, but I'm not sure if she is #0288..............it's possible though, she does look very similar.

Bish

joy194 · 2005-08-06 18:16:05

Hey Bish, compare some details: shape of eyebrows, pierced tongue (closeup of this feature can be seen on the preview page of alexamodel.com), shape of hairline, profile of the nose and the shilouette of the teeth, colour of the hair, clean face skin. If you compare those details then it should be obvious that she is #0288! However, one thing is confusing me a little bit: FTV is a US site and BA an Aussy site. Or is #0288 somebody else than Alexa? And why don't we see her neither on ISM nor on Abby? Will we see her again on BA, maybe in the Overkill section?

Last edited by joy194 (2005-08-07 14:05:36)

Bishop Of Bath & Wells · 2005-08-06 21:31:33

The more I compare, the more convinced I am that 0288 is indeed Alexa, especially when you look at her eyebrows and teeth.

BA is indeed an Aussie-based site, but it accepts submissions from all over the world, the US included. Plus, from what I can gather, we'll be seeing her on ISM at some point in the future.

Well spotted, Joy194!!

Bish

joy194 · 2005-08-07 07:02:56

Thank's Bish!
One more treasure I just discovered on ISM: Have a look at Nelly (added to the folio on aug the 4th). Remember her face?

Bishop Of Bath & Wells · 2005-08-07 08:16:04

Is she #0328? They look very alike.

Bish

joy194 · 2005-08-07 14:01:07

No Sir! Try again!

joy194 · 2005-08-07 14:04:45

Erdna!
You are right! #0194 is one of my top five! So I took the number as identity! The way she comes is so sweet, like her beauty. She has to be on overkill! If you want to see deatails of her, go to ISM! Enjoy!

Last edited by joy194 (2005-08-07 14:05:11)

joy194 · 2005-08-07 14:13:00

Dear Administrator,
I just recognized that giving information pointing to other sites is not fair. So I quit this kind of info! Sorry for that! I will stay as a kind customer, beacause your site is the best of all!

pinguin · 2005-08-21 22:38:59

joy194 wrote:

One more treasure I just discovered on ISM: Have a look at Nelly (added to the folio on aug the 4th). Remember her face?

Hi joy194. Tell me, having seen 194 in full detail on ISM, did that change your fascination for her? I must confes that I found her completely different from what I imagined from het BA performance. I mean no disrespect in any way, but it almost felt like watching two different women.

jamesd · 2005-08-22 04:47:44

joy194, you will find that both this site and ISM are owned and operated by GMBILL PTY, so you needn't be concerned about promoting competing companies.

Personally, I'm happy to see information about the apperances of those here who are pofessional models (paid for their appearances sufficiently that it forms a significant part of their regular income, happens several times or is arranged via a modelling or similar agency) in any place at which they appear, though the operators here have expressed the view that they consider it inappropriate to do so at this site. There are a variaty of reasons for favoring or disfavoring this so it's really a judgment call; if nothing else, it preserves some of the non-professional image the site seeks.

BA doesn't limit its selection to those in Australia and some are known to be from Canada, some apparently using the same studio. You should expect those from any part of the world here.

richard · 2005-08-23 02:06:33

jamesd wrote:

joy194, you will find that both this site and ISM are owned and operated by GMBILL PTY, so you needn't be concerned about promoting competing companies.
Personally, I'm happy to see information about the apperances of those here who are pofessional models (paid for their appearances sufficiently that it forms a significant part of their regular income, happens several times or is arranged via a modelling or similar agency) in any place at which they appear, though the operators here have expressed the view that they consider it inappropriate to do so at this site. There are a variaty of reasons for favoring or disfavoring this so it's really a judgment call; if nothing else, it preserves some of the non-professional image the site seeks.
BA doesn't limit its selection to those in Australia and some are known to be from Canada, some apparently using the same studio. You should expect those from any part of the world here.

To correct you on a couple of things: Nobody here is a professional model even in the way you describe. The same is true for ISM with the exception of two girls, both of whom are professional non-nude models, and about 3 girls who operate their own nude web sites.

And again, there is no studio.

Ell · 2005-08-23 03:21:10

richard wrote:

And again, there is no studio.

Or Playboy Mansion?

101 · 2005-09-26 16:08:10

I recall that it was said "Ms. 288" would be gracing ISM. She has today.

288fan · 2005-10-18 23:45:41

joy194 wrote:

shape of eyebrows, pierced tongue, shape of hairline, profile of the nose and the shilouette of the teeth, colour of the hair, clean face skin. If you compare those details then it should be obvious that she is #0288!

I'll have to agree that she looks like #288, but there's something missing. I can't explain what it is, but it's there. After thoroughly studying their faces, I can only conclude that (IMHO) she is not #288. Man, I hope we'll get a #288 overkill...

Jakeview · 2005-10-19 20:53:06

I studied their faces too(288 and alexa) and have to agree with 288fan. Lots of their features are similar but there's a main ingredient missing. It could be that 288 lacks the ethnic quality that Alexa has...or it could all be in the lighting and makeup. They just don't seem to be quite the same girl.

No1steelerfan · 2005-10-20 05:00:42

pinguin wrote:

ilana wrote:
Hey Joy, I know that 288 is on ishotmyself.com under the nickname 'cat
Are you sure? I can't find anyone on ISM by that nickname.

http://www.beautifulagony.com/index.php … 42&sheet=5

http://www.ishotmyself.com/public/view_ … =solarized

They look fairly alike to me. There may be merit in this comparison.

Last edited by No1steelerfan (2005-10-20 05:07:41)

288fan · 2005-10-20 16:00:32

Jakeview wrote:

288 lacks the ethnic quality that Alexa has

Exactly! There it is!

salsasalsa · 2005-10-20 17:54:07

Jakeview wrote:

It could be that 288 lacks the ethnic quality that Alexa has.

What is an ethnic quality? We all have 'ethnic qualities' of some sort or other.

288fan · 2005-10-20 18:38:22

salsasalsa wrote:

What is an ethnic quality? We all have 'ethnic qualities' of some sort or other.

Yes, we do ! And Alexa has an ethnic quality which #288 lacks. Or you could put it the other way around, of course...

#1 2005-08-03 17:03:15

Agony 0288

#2 2005-08-04 04:04:11

Re: Agony 0288

#3 2005-08-04 07:24:49

Re: Agony 0288

#4 2005-08-04 11:37:52

Re: Agony 0288

#5 2005-08-05 05:31:01

Re: Agony 0288

#6 2005-08-05 13:57:20

Re: Agony 0288

#7 2005-08-05 17:28:52

Re: Agony 0288

#8 2005-08-06 18:16:05

Re: Agony 0288

#9 2005-08-06 21:31:33

Re: Agony 0288

#10 2005-08-07 07:02:56

Re: Agony 0288

#11 2005-08-07 08:16:04

Re: Agony 0288

#12 2005-08-07 14:01:07

Re: Agony 0288

#13 2005-08-07 14:04:45

Re: Agony 0288

#14 2005-08-07 14:13:00

Re: Agony 0288

#15 2005-08-21 22:38:59

Re: Agony 0288

#16 2005-08-22 04:47:44

Re: Agony 0288

#17 2005-08-23 02:06:33

Re: Agony 0288

#18 2005-08-23 03:21:10

Re: Agony 0288

#19 2005-09-26 16:08:10

Re: Agony 0288

#20 2005-10-18 23:45:41

Re: Agony 0288

#21 2005-10-19 20:53:06

Re: Agony 0288

#22 2005-10-20 05:00:42

Re: Agony 0288

#23 2005-10-20 16:00:32

Re: Agony 0288

#24 2005-10-20 17:54:07

Re: Agony 0288

#25 2005-10-20 18:38:22

Re: Agony 0288

Board footer