410?

gideontan · 2015-10-09 17:01:46

Was browsing the females section when I came across them, would like to know if admin has accidentally mislabelled them as female instead of male? Or if it's just my hearing and eyesight that has a problem, lol. Thanks and pardon my ignorance in advance!

erolscom · 2015-10-09 20:36:26

definitely female; four orgasms in rapid succession

gideontan · 2015-10-13 07:08:37

erolscom wrote:

definitely female; four orgasms in rapid succession

thank you!

another one, 1332?

erolscom · 2015-10-13 13:00:58

Unequivocally male, thoroughly masturbated and ? fellated, by partner 1333 with visible ejaculation

erolscom · 2015-10-13 13:38:36

Searching on "females" definitely shows a few males; often when there are couple-pairs, 1332 and 1333 only one of several examples.

lauren · 2015-10-14 00:29:02

erolscom wrote:

Searching on "females" definitely shows a few males; often when there are couple-pairs, 1332 and 1333 only one of several examples.

1332 is male, corrected now. Because of shared confessions he'd jumped into the female ba's.

erolscom · 2015-10-14 01:14:22

Same with 1328 and 1341

lauren · 2015-10-14 05:29:04

erolscom wrote:

Same with 1328 and 1341

1328 is a guy and is filed correctly.

1341 is a woman and also filed correctly.

ranger87 · 2015-10-14 11:37:56

How about yesterdays 3510 ???

erolscom · 2015-10-14 12:32:39

Female search page 136 has #1328, 1332 and 1342, all males

lauren · 2015-10-14 22:03:55

ranger87 wrote:

How about yesterdays 3510 ???

Agonist #3510 identifies as transgender

lauren · 2015-10-14 22:41:20

erolscom wrote:

Female search page 136 has #1328, 1332 and 1342, all males

Hey erolscom,

You're looking in the Everybody section, this is why the guys are showing up.

Everybody: http://beautifulagony.com/public/main.p … ffset=2160

I searched the females section, page 136 takes you to the 0380-0399 range.

Female: http://beautifulagony.com/public/main.p … ffset=2160

erolscom · 2015-10-15 11:54:31

Lauren, I guess you are right although it seemed to me I was clicking on female but it must have hit everybody; the two lines are close together !

erolscom · 2015-10-15 23:14:34

Ah, now I see the "problem". If i first click on "female" in the View menu on the left of the page and then put a number into the search option at the bottom, the search reverts to "everybody" instead of staying on "female" only. Now that I get it, it's not a problem !

ranger87 · 2015-10-16 11:48:46

erolscom wrote:

Ah, now I see the "problem". If i first click on "female" in the View menu on the left of the page and then put a number into the search option at the bottom, the search reverts to "everybody" instead of staying on "female" only. Now that I get it, it's not a problem !

I'd like to see that changed so it stays the same gender if possible...

gideontan · 2015-10-17 17:14:51

What about 1874?

erolscom · 2015-10-17 21:06:32

I'd suppose female but remarkably androgynous.

lauren · 2015-10-19 22:24:28

erolscom wrote:

I'd suppose female but remarkably androgynous.

yep

#1 2015-10-09 17:01:46

410?

#2 2015-10-09 20:36:26

Re: 410?

#3 2015-10-13 07:08:37

Re: 410?

#4 2015-10-13 13:00:58

Re: 410?

#5 2015-10-13 13:38:36

Re: 410?

#6 2015-10-14 00:29:02

Re: 410?

#7 2015-10-14 01:14:22

Re: 410?

#8 2015-10-14 05:29:04

Re: 410?

#9 2015-10-14 11:37:56

Re: 410?

#10 2015-10-14 12:32:39

Re: 410?

#11 2015-10-14 22:03:55

Re: 410?

#12 2015-10-14 22:41:20

Re: 410?

#13 2015-10-15 11:54:31

Re: 410?

#14 2015-10-15 23:14:34

Re: 410?

#15 2015-10-16 11:48:46

Re: 410?

#16 2015-10-17 17:14:51

Re: 410?

#17 2015-10-17 21:06:32

Re: 410?

#18 2015-10-19 22:24:28

Re: 410?

Board footer