#2879

101 · 2013-10-03 05:02:45

Holy jesus!

I patiently wait.

ranger87 · 2013-10-13 17:18:11

It doesn't seem to be up to BA's usual standards. Probably an experiment.

101 · 2013-10-13 20:50:11

I would say it simply pushes boundries of framing. "Ideally" (?) the camera might have been zoomed in a bit and placed to the side to hide the actual mechanism of stimulation.

Buuuuuuuuuuut, I'm not one to complain about this video. It's just what would happen in a video anyway, but we see the person doing the stimulation. There isn't really nudity.

Well, maybe sorta. I want to make a "halfass" joke. But the video is certainly not halfassed

Last edited by 101 (2013-10-13 20:51:50)

jnf1977 · 2013-10-14 04:18:56

The late great ms 2879...I love it when she says more please and screams louder than any other submission....she's being destroyed and digs it....

freeline678 · 2013-10-14 17:33:51

hmm, she referenced doing other material, but not sure if I got her name right on the search. Maybe it's not her stage name?

bringer34 · 2013-10-14 23:06:25

freeline678 wrote:

hmm, she referenced doing other material, but not sure if I got her name right on the search. Maybe it's not her stage name?

The name she gave was Andre Shakti. It is a stage name.

freeline678 · 2013-10-22 01:13:02

grazie

UniqueNY · 2015-10-20 23:41:24

I heard more of an Andra or Audra

UniqueNY · 2015-12-13 21:22:52

She doesn't seem to be on IFM, at least not under any name including the word "Shakti". Does anyone know if she is on any other sites?

#1 2013-10-03 05:02:45

#2879

#2 2013-10-13 17:18:11

Re: #2879

#3 2013-10-13 20:50:11

Re: #2879

#4 2013-10-14 04:18:56

Re: #2879

#5 2013-10-14 17:33:51

Re: #2879

#6 2013-10-14 23:06:25

Re: #2879

#7 2013-10-22 01:13:02

Re: #2879

#8 2015-10-20 23:41:24

Re: #2879

#9 2015-12-13 21:22:52

Re: #2879

Board footer