#353: are you kidding me?

dittoman · 2006-01-13 19:38:07

Granted I'm new to this whole thing, but... my God.

#353 may be the most beautiful thing I have ever seen. God bless the Internet!

Wherever you are, Ms. 353, know that you are a heavenly creature. As far as I'm concerned, she's the most beautiful agony on this website by a factor of ten.

Jakeview · 2006-01-13 20:37:17

Then you really need to sign up for ISM and Abby Winters.

erdna · 2006-01-15 06:58:22

dittoman, welcome. Have you seen Ms#353 in her full body agony OV0086? Like a lot of us this is what I would like to see more often. You have made a good choice.:)

Bishop Of Bath & Wells · 2006-01-15 10:28:53

erdna wrote:

Have you seen Ms#353 in her full body agony OV0086?

The young lady featured in the full body agony overkill is 0348, not 0353 I'm afraid.

Bish

erdna · 2006-01-15 16:47:57

Thanks Bish for the remark. Good eyes. I clean my glasses and check it out again.:)

erdna · 2006-01-15 17:12:03

OK dittoman and Bish. Sorry for my mistake. Ms#453 is the catgirl. How come I was wrong. A catgirl, you don't forget that. They are both (#353 and #348) both incredibly sexy and I would say providing us with about the same type of agony.

stingray78 · 2006-03-13 02:28:16

MS#353 looks so young or do i need glasses??

ashmedi · 2006-03-13 04:15:37

#353 is young, very sweet, and most desireable.

I don't think she expected or knew the cat, so I wonder where she was, and if she had company? or if She was company?

Last edited by ashmedi (2006-03-13 04:16:12)

erdna · 2006-03-13 05:11:19

ashmedi, Ms#353 is Lottie from AW. We could see her more completely in 2 videos on this site, alone and with another girl named Dee but after checking out today on AW site, it seems her pictures and videos have been removed. I wonder why? She is maybe young but quite hot and uninhibited and she is a cat lover.

PC elmo · 2006-03-13 17:05:18

Mmm, one of my favorites. Not sure I get the "NO" part, but that scream of utter release is very intense. She gets totally consumed by her orgasm. I can hardly wait to see her on the other site(s). Is she on ISM, too?

stingray78 · 2006-03-13 23:03:49

Pardon me but whats AW site? url?

elfman11 · 2006-03-13 23:11:44

Hi Stingray78. They are talking about Abby Winters. Another Australian site. More of a porn site than this one and not a patch on BA in my opinion but take a look yourself and see.

www.abbywinters.com

Elfman

erdna · 2006-03-15 05:45:10

elfman11, for me AW is not porno but erotic. Girls are natural (no silicone boobs for instance and they seem to follow their own scenario including a lot of endearment) and are not pushed to do things they don't like. They take their time to built up to something becoming more and more sexy.There is a big difference between AW and traditional cheap porno.

Bishop Of Bath & Wells · 2006-03-15 18:41:59

Well said Erdna.

The best thing about sites like BA, AW, ISM, and IFM is that they allow the models to be themselves, none of this stupid nonsense to do with cheerleader outfits or wearing high heels whilst posing nude on a bed (if I see either of these two cliches, I automatically know that a site is not worth further investigation).

Bish

elfman11 · 2006-03-15 22:55:01

No offence intended Erdna and Bish. I subscibed to AW myself for awhile and would agree that it is considerably better than most sites. what I was trying to suggest (perhaps not very well) was that AW was closer to the main stream than BA. The vids in AW are filmed and edited (and presumably staged?) by professionals and therefore lacks the "do it yourself" intamcy of BA. However if we use the old axiom that pornography debases whilst erotocism celebrates I would agree that AW is erotic more than pornographic. ISM I cannot comment on as I do not know the site.

Sorry if I ruffled any feathers gentlemen.

Elfman.

kurvenal · 2006-03-16 03:36:56

Bish, please enlighten me. What is IFM. Could you possibly post a URL?

Kurvenal

ashmedi · 2006-03-16 03:47:43

This is a new site under construction and we're not supposed to discuss it yet.

When mods are ready, they will post it and advise.

Patience is a virtue.

erdna · 2006-03-16 05:14:57

ashmedi, as the wiseman to be in Siddharta, I can think, I can wait and I can fast. But the results have to be there. We should know more by tomorrow.

PC elmo · 2006-03-16 07:16:53

elfman11 wrote:

... However if we use the old axiom that pornography debases whilst erotocism celebrates I would agree that AW is erotic more than pornographic.

That is an excellent way of expressing that key distinction, Elfman. As far as "art" goes, who cares? When celebration trumps consumption/posession, that's where it's at!

#1 2006-01-13 19:38:07

#353: are you kidding me?

#2 2006-01-13 20:37:17

Re: #353: are you kidding me?

#3 2006-01-15 06:58:22

Re: #353: are you kidding me?

#4 2006-01-15 10:28:53

Re: #353: are you kidding me?

#5 2006-01-15 16:47:57

Re: #353: are you kidding me?

#6 2006-01-15 17:12:03

Re: #353: are you kidding me?

#7 2006-03-13 02:28:16

Re: #353: are you kidding me?

#8 2006-03-13 04:15:37

Re: #353: are you kidding me?

#9 2006-03-13 05:11:19

Re: #353: are you kidding me?

#10 2006-03-13 17:05:18

Re: #353: are you kidding me?

#11 2006-03-13 23:03:49

Re: #353: are you kidding me?

#12 2006-03-13 23:11:44

Re: #353: are you kidding me?

#13 2006-03-15 05:45:10

Re: #353: are you kidding me?

#14 2006-03-15 18:41:59

Re: #353: are you kidding me?

#15 2006-03-15 22:55:01

Re: #353: are you kidding me?

#16 2006-03-16 03:36:56

Re: #353: are you kidding me?

#17 2006-03-16 03:47:43

Re: #353: are you kidding me?

#18 2006-03-16 05:14:57

Re: #353: are you kidding me?

#19 2006-03-16 07:16:53

Re: #353: are you kidding me?

Board footer