You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Is Ms. 5219 the first time on this site that a contributor's vagina was shown as well?
Offline
As far as I know, we are witnessing history
Offline
Yes, and it was a lovely start to a beautiful Agony I loved it
and for technical accuracy, Ms 5219 bared her Vulva and breasts for us
Last edited by ashmedi1 (2021-04-16 01:58:46)
Ashmedi is an ancient god of Rage and Lust
Rage doesn't fit me, but Lust fits to a T
Offline
Seemed natural, and didn't detract from the wonder of the beautiful agony in the least! Applause to both the artist and the editors.
Offline
I gree ... leave this choice to the member. Unless it grossly overplayed, it's perfectly natural. Still the focus is on the face, body movement, growing excitement, etc. As it should be.
Offline
Not quite the same but you do see pubes for the confession vid of 3063.
Offline
I'm sure it's all data driven and meant to increase the number of subscriptions, but I for one feel sad about this shift. BA is clearly moving into IFM teritory (full body agonies, visible breasts and now even a vagina) and IFM is becoming a plain porn site (pee breaks, blowjobs and penetrative sex).
The strict "from the shoulders up" concept was what made BA stand out, but I guess Google Analytics is telling me I'm a grumpy old man.
Last edited by penguin6 (2021-06-17 11:31:46)
Offline
What sets BA and IFM apart for me is the reality and vulnerability of real people having real orgasms, so the level of exposure or the types of acts shown isn't an issue for me. The no-nudity rule of BA is novel, but I am fine with the rules being relaxed to an extent. Especially with women's breasts as aside from the perv in me liking to see boobs so many cultures are becoming more tolerant toward women's breasts being normal and not shameful.
For the record I am very much in support of snippets of even full nudity from contributors getting into position if they consent to it being shown. I see it as part of the process, sort of endearing, and... it's just fun to me see some of these people nude who may never be on ISM or IFM.
Last edited by Tuxedo101 (2021-06-17 21:15:53)
Offline
Totally agree with Tuxedo there
Offline
I'm sure it's all data driven and meant to increase the number of subscriptions, but I for one feel sad about this shift. BA is clearly moving into IFM teritory (full body agonies, visible breasts and now even a vagina) and IFM is becoming a plain porn site (pee breaks, blowjobs and penetrative sex).
The strict "from the shoulders up" concept was what made BA stand out, but I guess Google Analytics is telling me I'm a grumpy old man.
We're not driven like that, and TBH haven't looked at Analytics for at least 10 years. If we were so membership focused we'd be leaking content on all the tube sites and we'd have an army of affiliates touting us all over the web. But we don't.
It's just a response to changing values really, and the idea of following rules for the sake of it doesn't gel with me personally these days. The contributors are fine with it, most subscribers seem to like it, and if people want to cancel us for not sticking with our traditional values that's Ok with me.
Offline
I'm curious what the nudity boundary might be, if there is any.
Offline
I'm curious what the nudity boundary might be, if there is any.
It has probably been reached But who knows.
Offline
Have there been any more since this one? I’m a longtime subscriber but only an occasional visitor these days; I might’ve missed something.
Offline
Have there been any more since this one? I’m a longtime subscriber but only an occasional visitor these days; I might’ve missed something.
Maybe you'd enjoy ifeelmyself.com!
Offline
Maybe you'd enjoy ifeelmyself.com!
Longtime subscriber there, too!
Last edited by JovBill (2023-05-07 07:57:21)
Offline
3934A3 has a couple kitty slips
Offline
Is Ms. 5219 the first time on this site that a contributor's vagina was shown as well?
Very sweet to see, and also a very sweet agony. I loved it.
Offline
Ms. 4000-A6 is another one, although not clearly visible because of lighting
Offline
Ms. 4000-A6 is another one, although not clearly visible because of lighting
that's true, I went out of my mind with her...
Offline
Pages: 1