beautiful agony

Portuguese Man'O War · 2005-01-22 12:34:41

I am, of course, talking about the frequent appearance of large sections of the girl's left leg. While I must confess part of me thinks this is a rather exiting development, the other part is actually sort of disappointed. The truth is I've become rather used to not expecting to see anything below the shoulders. I kind of like to be teased that way! I don't want to sound like a Guardian of the Temple here, but rules are rules and Miss 200 has, at the very least, bended them. Go ahead and call me a control freak, if you wish!

Bishop Of Bath & Wells · 2005-01-22 12:46:16

She bended the rules, sure, but certainly not broken them. All we really saw were a couple of brief glimpses of her thigh.

I enjoyed clip #200, even though I chose not to save it (I'm very picky). It was a slightly unusual position she adopted, but it evidently works very well for her...........

Bish

Jakeview · 2005-01-22 13:13:49

I liked it. It's nice to see someone trying a new position now and again. I think back to #100 and how interesting it was to see her on her stomach(not to mention the added benefit of seeing her backside out of focus in the background.) The appearance of #200's leg was just a small clue to her personal style. For me, it only added to the experience. I'll also mention that the very clear sound of her wetness was a big plus as well.

syzygy · 2005-01-22 15:54:20

I'm with you, Jake. A style just a bit out of the envelope, if you will, is welcome.

And yes, it added to the experience for me to see a glimpse of her leg. And oh god yes, the slurping sound of that wetness. Ahhhh. . .)

I'm risking the flames here, but in my ideal world, we would get one ishotmyself style still photo with each agonee, just so we would know what her body looks like.

patrik · 2005-01-23 12:00:35

I like the idea of the agonees bending the rules slightly. I would not mind seing a breast for a short while in one clip or a thigh in another...

This just ads to the experience. The road downmarket to a plain adultpornsite is long. I do not think anyone has to be afraid of that.

It would also be great if more agonees would present themselves in the overkill section and give some clues to their personality.

Last edited by patrik (2005-01-24 02:30:54)

Jo · 2005-01-23 15:39:23

patrik wrote:
The road downmarket to a plain adultpornsite is long. I do not think anyone has to be afraid of that.

Yes the way down is long, but mind that every way starts with the first step.

I have to admit that I also like some surprise, but my point of view is also not clear about this *new development*...

Only hope that the way does not lead *down* but further...

Justme · 2005-01-25 04:29:17

I also liked it. It's nice to see something else than the usual "flat on her back" position now and then.

(That's why "Number 5" is still one of my favourites).

And the occasional glimpse of one leg also added to the experience.

There have been a lot of posts in this forum which asked to see more of the agonees. Well. i think shots like this could be a possible "extension".

From my point of view, there could be even more visible, without changing this site to a plain adultpornsite, as long as there is no nuditiy involved.

Jo sure is right about the small steps, but if it keeps within the "no nudity" limit, there should not be a problem.

(just my opinion).

highhard · 2005-01-25 13:11:26

portuguese get over it. its no different than # 196 showing her bra encased right breast. everyone has there own way to pleasure themselves. in the heat of passion she probably didnt know she was showing her leg. who made you the site monitor anyway. i think # 200 is a extremely hot video. very original.one of the best. i dont think she broke any rules and if she had they obviously wouldnt have posted it. MY 2 cents!

msnevil · 2005-01-26 05:47:20

The camera was still on her face at all times. Hence it never really Changed the perspective.

Was she supposed to masturbate in a postion she finds unnatural like a flat position? In order to qualify for this site?

Besides you missed the cleavage tatoo. Either way, who cares.

Sign me up for the "200" fan club.

patrik · 2005-01-26 10:02:29

I like nr 200. It is nice seeing a bit more of the agonees body. It also felt genuine, you certainly see that she had to work hard to reach climax, if she ever did. I am not so sure...

Portuguese Man'O War · 2005-01-27 16:47:39

Just for the record, this topic is basically meant to be a joke... I actually think #200 is a thoroughly nice girl and an excellent agonee, honest! (though I do have the secret wish to become the site monitor, Highhard!)

highhard · 2005-01-28 00:55:35

lol

patrik · 2005-02-02 06:40:35

It is a pleasure when the rules are bended a bit. Nr 100 shows her naked backside in small small glimpses a few times during her clip. Great! More of that!

beautiful agony

#1 2005-01-22 12:34:41

Agonee #200: Bold innovator or just plain subversive?!

#2 2005-01-22 12:46:16

Re: Agonee #200: Bold innovator or just plain subversive?!

#3 2005-01-22 13:13:49

Re: Agonee #200: Bold innovator or just plain subversive?!

#4 2005-01-22 15:54:20

Re: Agonee #200: Bold innovator or just plain subversive?!

#5 2005-01-23 12:00:35

Re: Agonee #200: Bold innovator or just plain subversive?!

#6 2005-01-23 15:39:23

Re: Agonee #200: Bold innovator or just plain subversive?!

patrik wrote:

#7 2005-01-25 04:29:17

Re: Agonee #200: Bold innovator or just plain subversive?!

#8 2005-01-25 13:11:26

Re: Agonee #200: Bold innovator or just plain subversive?!

#9 2005-01-26 05:47:20

Re: Agonee #200: Bold innovator or just plain subversive?!

#10 2005-01-26 10:02:29

Re: Agonee #200: Bold innovator or just plain subversive?!

#11 2005-01-27 16:47:39

Re: Agonee #200: Bold innovator or just plain subversive?!

#12 2005-01-28 00:55:35

Re: Agonee #200: Bold innovator or just plain subversive?!

#13 2005-02-02 06:40:35

Re: Agonee #200: Bold innovator or just plain subversive?!

Board footer